Skip to main content

Compensation for unionized workers is a moderating influence on hospital costs

As part of his discussion of cost pressures on Ontario hospital funding, the Auditor General sites a recent major union hospital settlement with (he says) "an average annual pay raise of about 1.5%".  

He does not note that the 1.5% average is actually lower than the percentage the government intends to increase hospital funding -- less than one-half the increase in fact.  

So this compensation change is actually creating room for other hospital budget line items to increase at an above average rate.  If wages increase at a percentage rate less than the overall percentage funding increase, other line items can increase at an above average rate.  If (as is likely) the hospitals increase labour productivity, the percentage increase in the total wage package will be even less, leaving even more space for above average increases for other line items. 

That is going to be very helpful to the government.    For example, if health care funding increases 3.6% as planned, and compensation goes up 1.5%, and (as the Auditor suggests) employee compensation is equal to 50% of health care costs, then the government will be able to increase all other areas of health care spending by 5.7%.  That's a lot of help -- all thanks to health care employees taking a lower than average increase.  

The moderating role of compensation increases is also borne out when the Audtior reviews the major cost pressures in health care.  Using studies from the Ontario government, the TD bank, and the CD Howe Institute, he notes that long term annual increases in health care costs should range from 5.9% (according to the Ontario government) to 6.4% (CD Howe), or 6.5% (TD).  

This is about double the funding increases the Liberals and PCs propose  -- and that means there will be huge pressure to cut services.

Notably, most of those cost pressures come from areas completely unrelated to hospital employee compensation.

So, for example, TD estimates that utilization will drive up costs 2% annually, population aging 1% annually, and population growth 1% annually.  Inflation (which would include in part the nominal employee wage increases) would account for the other 2.5%.  And even the 2.5% inflationary pressures includes factors well beyond hospital union wage increases (which, in any case, are running below that rate, even excluding any productivity gains).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).    For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.   But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending.  Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2. 

Paramedic Services in Canada: Structure, Privatization, Unionization and other issues

Governance and Funding :  While police and fire services are usually municipal services, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are typically controlled by provincial governments.  In Ontario, regional municipal governments have responsibility for delivering and funding EMS.  But even in Ontario the province plays a key role, strictly regulating EMS, providing funding for 50% of the approved land ambulance costs, and paying 100% of the approved costs for air ambulance, dispatch, base hospitals, First Nation EMS, and for territories without municipal government. Delivery :  Like police and fire services, EMS is predominantly a publicly provided service in Canada.   But businesses have now made some significant in-roads into EMS, primarily  Medavie,  a private corporation based in the Maritimes that describes itself as not-for-profit.  Medavie goes back over 70 years, with its roots in health insurance.  It still operates Medavie Blue Cross with 1,900 employees.  It now a