Skip to main content

Liberals conceal ugly concessions (as other wages rise)

The proposed public sector "compensation restraint"  legislation floated on Wednesday by the Liberals is neatly silent on whether the government will impose contract concessions on 500,000 working people.

The government consistently talks of a "compensation freeze" or "compensation restraint".  Obligingly, the media has usually repeated that framing of the issue, as if it were the main bone of contention between the government and the unions.

But actions speak louder than words and it it is quite clear from the terms the government is actually imposing on school board workers (through Bill 115) that contract concessions rather than a contract freeze is what the government has in mind.

While I will leave it to the lawyers to have the final word on the proposed legislation, the government's proposed Respecting Collective Bargaining Act 2012 artfully leaves the framework of the contracts to be imposed undefined.  The "mandates" that will set the terms for those agreements will be set by the Management Board of Cabinet and won't be revealed until after the legislation is passed:
Mandates and criteria 
5.  (1)  The Management Board of Cabinet may issue one or more mandates setting out criteria that may be used to determine whether a collective agreement is consistent with the Province’s goals to eliminate the deficit and protect the delivery of public services.
So they aren't saying exactly what they will impose. This allows the Liberals to keep to their "compensation freeze" message track -- and to encourage some wan hope before the legislation is passed that perhaps it won't be so bad. 

But it also gives the Liberals a free hand to impose some pretty bad deals once the legislation passes the (minority) legislature.   

This when average weekly wages in Ontario are up 3.4%  over the last year (as of August 2012) and public sector union wage settlements are averaging half of that. 

The proposed legislation also indicates that the mandates may vary from one group of workers to another, opening up the possibility for different treatment of one set of workers from another:
Same(2)  Different mandates may be issued with respect to different sectors, classes of employers or particular employers, classes of employees and the corresponding bargaining organizations.

Finally, the proposed legislation opens up the possibility that some agreements already signed may meet the criteria that will be established in the mandate.

Criteria(3)  The criteria may address matters of compensation and service delivery and such other matters as the Management Board of Cabinet considers appropriate.
Transition(4)  Without limiting the generality of subsection (3), the criteria may have effect with respect to a period before the date on which this subsection comes into force, if a collective agreement to which the mandate applies has effect before that date.
Will an already signed agreement meet the Liberals' mandate?  That is bound to concern some.

Vagueness has always been a main play by the Liberals, and so it continues here.

Labels:

Comments

  1. susansmithSeptember 30, 2012 at 4:18 PM

    Meanwhile Lib posters federally are suggesting the poster child Justin will save the day - nay, it's another pretend Liberal to the rescue who will do the switch-a-roo.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).    For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.   But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending.  Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th
Post a Comment
Read more

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2. 
Post a Comment
Read more

Paramedic Services in Canada: Structure, Privatization, Unionization and other issues

Governance and Funding :  While police and fire services are usually municipal services, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are typically controlled by provincial governments.  In Ontario, regional municipal governments have responsibility for delivering and funding EMS.  But even in Ontario the province plays a key role, strictly regulating EMS, providing funding for 50% of the approved land ambulance costs, and paying 100% of the approved costs for air ambulance, dispatch, base hospitals, First Nation EMS, and for territories without municipal government. Delivery :  Like police and fire services, EMS is predominantly a publicly provided service in Canada.   But businesses have now made some significant in-roads into EMS, primarily  Medavie,  a private corporation based in the Maritimes that describes itself as not-for-profit.  Medavie goes back over 70 years, with its roots in health insurance.  It still operates Medavie Blue Cross with 1,900 employees.  It now a
Post a Comment
Read more