Skip to main content

Now the doctors speak out about hospital cuts


Scarborough General Hospital. Photo by  Benson Kua
While physicians and surgeons have not usually been at the forefront of campaigns against cutbacks, more of them have begun to express concerns about hospital cuts in Ontario. Here are three recent examples. with a different emphasis from each.

At a Rotary Club meeting May 3, Dr. Robert Ting, president of the Medical Staff Association at the Scarborough Hospital, noted the issue isn't management, it's a lack of funding, and it's getting worse.

"The politicians, they can criticize the management and everything, but even if they had the best management in the world, they wouldn't be able to keep the hospitals open under this kind of scenario...This is just the tip of the iceberg," Dr Ting warned.   The hospital is facing $19.6 million in cuts and more than 300 doctors have signed a petition decrying the cuts.

In Perth-Smith Falls, the Lanark County Medical Society organized a well attended public meeting about the local hospital cuts.  Following the meeting the president of the Medical Society wrote: 


"The local LHIN lead was full of the predictable empty rhetoric of surgical efficiencies, telehealth, health connect and improved access to home care. Nobody was buying it.
"Yes surgical techniques have reduced hospital length of stay but hospitals are not just for surgery; they also look after the frail elderly with chronic complex illness. Many people in that audience had experienced the dislocation of senior loved ones to other hospitals because of lack of beds or experienced prolonged waits in the ER for the same reason. Visitng loved ones in a neighbouring hospital is difficult when you don't drive and there is no bus.
"Those in the audience have come to understand that telehealth is a one way ticket to the ER. Many of the four thousand residents in Smiths Falls without a family doctor have realized that Health Connect is largely a PR exercise and many in our community have tried to access home care to find out that it is largely a phantom program with no meaningful support offered.
"To suggest that with an increasingly ageing population, who despite the best wishes of government continue to get ill as they grow older, we will need less hospital capacity is, at best an exercise in wishful thinking and at worst, a deliberate attempt to mislead the public.

"The beauty about being in a rural farming community is that everybody recognizes BS when they smell it. This doesn't pass the sniff test."
Health Sciences North, Sudbury. Photo by mysudbury.ca
Finally, Dr. Peter Zalan, president of the Medical Staff Association at Health Sciences North in Sudbury told the hospital's board Tuesday night that provincial austerity measures are increasing wait times for non-emergency procedures and that the city's surgeons are not happy. Many surgeons have told him "they are embarrassed to meet new patients in the office since they cannot offer them timely help."

The Sudbury Star reports that Zalan doesn't disagree hospitals need to be downsized, but called it "curious" the province isn't directing hospitals on what services to cut. "They give no directions on what to downsize...Just, 'suck it up.' "He wants the province to tell hospitals what to get rid of and to "tell the public what not to expect any more."  That leaves the province's 149 hospitals each trying to decide on their own what programs and services to chop. "That's chaos...You want a system."

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).    For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.   But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending.  Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th
Post a Comment
Read more

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2. 
Post a Comment
Read more

Paramedic Services in Canada: Structure, Privatization, Unionization and other issues

Governance and Funding :  While police and fire services are usually municipal services, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are typically controlled by provincial governments.  In Ontario, regional municipal governments have responsibility for delivering and funding EMS.  But even in Ontario the province plays a key role, strictly regulating EMS, providing funding for 50% of the approved land ambulance costs, and paying 100% of the approved costs for air ambulance, dispatch, base hospitals, First Nation EMS, and for territories without municipal government. Delivery :  Like police and fire services, EMS is predominantly a publicly provided service in Canada.   But businesses have now made some significant in-roads into EMS, primarily  Medavie,  a private corporation based in the Maritimes that describes itself as not-for-profit.  Medavie goes back over 70 years, with its roots in health insurance.  It still operates Medavie Blue Cross with 1,900 employees.  It now a
Post a Comment
Read more