Reducing the use of long term care: just a nice fairy tale?

Alex Munter the newly minted CEO of the Champlain LHIN makes it a bit more clear than is usually the case, that the focus on squeezing hospital beds has now spread to squeezing long term care beds. Hospitals have lost thousands of beds over the last twenty years, while LTC beds have increased. But the focus on diverting patients from hospital beds to home is broadening to include diverting patients from LTC beds.

It certainly is a very worthwhile goal for elders to stay in their homes rather than move to a long term care facility. Where it can be done, it should be done.

But is this new focus just a cover for a reduction in public care? The wait lists for a long term care bed have exploded in the last few years as government has squeezed hospital funding and slowed the creation of new LTC beds. Moreover, the large majority of patients in hospitals designated "alternate level of care" (ALC) are waiting for a long term care bed or for a different sort of hospital bed.

Only a small proportion of ALC patients in hospitals are waiting for home care. Just 139 patients out of 2,492 ALC patients in acute care beds in April 2011. The percentage waiting for home care is even smaller if we look at ALC patients in all sorts of hospital beds: about 200 out of 4,256 ALC patients -- 4.7% of ALC patients. That is a very small proportion of the ALC issue.

In fact, moving all the patients waiting for home care out of hospital immediately wouldn't open up enough beds to deal with one-third of the patients waiting in ER rooms for a hospital bed.

So it is far from clear that this focus can make a major difference to back-ups in the system. It may simply end up being a nice fairy tale that provides cover for governments that are reducing public care, not improving it.

FYI - Munter also notes that the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care estimates that population aging will add 0.7% annually to the cost of health care. That is lower than the estimate of 1% that is usually bandied about.

Comments

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding: There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities). For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year. But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data. This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization. Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion. That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year. The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million. In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2.

Paramedic Services in Canada: Structure, Privatization, Unionization and other issues

Governance and Funding : While police and fire services are usually municipal services, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are typically controlled by provincial governments. In Ontario, regional municipal governments have responsibility for delivering and funding EMS. But even in Ontario the province plays a key role, strictly regulating EMS, providing funding for 50% of the approved land ambulance costs, and paying 100% of the approved costs for air ambulance, dispatch, base hospitals, First Nation EMS, and for territories without municipal government. Delivery : Like police and fire services, EMS is predominantly a publicly provided service in Canada. But businesses have now made some significant in-roads into EMS, primarily Medavie, a private corporation based in the Maritimes that describes itself as not-for-profit. Medavie goes back over 70 years, with its roots in health insurance. It still operates Medavie Blue Cross with 1,900 employees. It now a

Defend Public Healthcare

Search This Blog