Reducing the use of long term care: just a nice fairy tale?

Alex Munter the newly minted CEO of the Champlain LHIN makes it a bit more clear than is usually the case, that the focus on squeezing hospital beds has now spread to squeezing long term care beds. Hospitals have lost thousands of beds over the last twenty years, while LTC beds have increased. But the focus on diverting patients from hospital beds to home is broadening to include diverting patients from LTC beds.

It certainly is a very worthwhile goal for elders to stay in their homes rather than move to a long term care facility. Where it can be done, it should be done.

But is this new focus just a cover for a reduction in public care? The wait lists for a long term care bed have exploded in the last few years as government has squeezed hospital funding and slowed the creation of new LTC beds. Moreover, the large majority of patients in hospitals designated "alternate level of care" (ALC) are waiting for a long term care bed or for a different sort of hospital bed.

Only a small proportion of ALC patients in hospitals are waiting for home care. Just 139 patients out of 2,492 ALC patients in acute care beds in April 2011. The percentage waiting for home care is even smaller if we look at ALC patients in all sorts of hospital beds: about 200 out of 4,256 ALC patients -- 4.7% of ALC patients. That is a very small proportion of the ALC issue.

In fact, moving all the patients waiting for home care out of hospital immediately wouldn't open up enough beds to deal with one-third of the patients waiting in ER rooms for a hospital bed.

So it is far from clear that this focus can make a major difference to back-ups in the system. It may simply end up being a nice fairy tale that provides cover for governments that are reducing public care, not improving it.

FYI - Munter also notes that the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care estimates that population aging will add 0.7% annually to the cost of health care. That is lower than the estimate of 1% that is usually bandied about.

Comments

Huge cuts in public sector wages predicted

The Ontario Financial Accountability Office (FAO) says that, with inflation, real wages in the public sector will decline 11.3% over the three year period 2021/2 - 2023/4 . This would radically deepen the trend towards lower wages during the last ten years. The FAO reports that since 2011, the average annual salary for the Ontario public sector employees (defined here as employees of schools, colleges, provincial government, provincial agencies, and hospitals) has increased by $10,385 -- or 1.6 per cent on average annually. This is the lowest increase of all the sectors and lower than inflation, which averaged 1.8 per cent per year. Over the ten years that would be about a 2% pay cut. The FAO reports that wage settlements were the lowest in the provincial public sector over the last decade: Hospital Wages Especially Challenged: The FAO predicts hospital wages will increase even less than in the public sector -- just ...

Are health care administrative expenses out of control in Ontario?

The Progressive Conservative government has justified its health restructuring plans with the claim that administrative expenses are much higher in Ontario than in Canada. When introducing the reforms, health minister Christine Elliott claimed , “Over the last five years, Ontario has spent 30% more than the Canadian average in administrative expenses on its health care system.” Elliott did not indicate her source of information. Presumably, however, the Progressive Conservatives are referring to the CIHI simplified and user friendly “ Your Health System ” graphs. Those graphs show “administrative expenses” in Ontario at 5.8% in Ontario while it is 4.5% in Canada. This CIHI measure is actually fairly narrowly defined. It is the percentage of “the legal entity’s” total expenses associated with the administrative, finance, human resources and communications functional centres. However “the legal entity” used for this estimate is [1] only...

Too many public sector workers in Ontario?

Opponents of public services often try to portray the public sector as having grown disproportionately. In fact, since 1976, the number of public sector employees has not quite kept pace with the population. In 1976, the number of public sector employees in Ontario as reported by Statistics Canada averaged 830,800. By 2012, the number had increased to 1,330,700 -- a 60.2% increase. That sounds like significant growth -- true. But the population has increased from 8,413,779 in 1976 to 13,505,900 in 2012, a 60.5% increase. In other words, population growth has run slightly ahead of the growth in public sector employment. In 1976, close to 10% of the population worked in the public sector. It stayed pretty much this way until the Mike Harris government came to power when it dipped below 9%. It returned close to the historical range in the last six years or so, declining in 2012 to below the 1976 averag...

Defend Public Healthcare

Search This Blog