Skip to main content

Will Ontario funding plans be revised if there is a double dip?

It's amusing to see the Harper government begin to prepare the way for stimulus spending should the economy dip into a second recession.

After the election, the Harper government changed its focus to curtailing public spending  -- or, as they like to refer to it, “lowering the deficit”. Programs for working people would  have to be scaled back.

But curtailing spending (and reducing the deficit) is, apparently, quite expendable if the economy tips downwards. 

If events do go this way, I'm betting that most of the stimulus will go directly to corporations (and the well to do) via infrastructure spending, cash for struggling corporate industries, and tax cuts. 

Programs aimed at working people will get short shrift from these guys: the squeeze on these programs may even get worse.  

And that's a pity -- the government stimulus may be necessary to stop capitalism from choking off its own growth, but why not stimulate growth by supporting programs for working people, i.e. those who are most affected by the downturn (and who spend most of their dollars at home).

And Ontario?
To date, this change in emphasis has not come to Ontario politics.  Both the Liberals and the Progressive Conservatives have announced funding plans firmly focused on curtailing spending after the election.  These funding plans would mean a much tighter squeeze on health care, social services, education, and other programs that benefit working people

And so far, they haven't even whispered about changing those plans.  

But the re-consideration of stimulus spending is beginning in many parts of the developed world.  

So Ontario policy development is lagging much more than just the Canadian debate.  

If it does come to Ontario, stimulus spending that directly benefits working people should be on the table.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).    For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.   But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending.  Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2. 

Paramedic Services in Canada: Structure, Privatization, Unionization and other issues

Governance and Funding :  While police and fire services are usually municipal services, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are typically controlled by provincial governments.  In Ontario, regional municipal governments have responsibility for delivering and funding EMS.  But even in Ontario the province plays a key role, strictly regulating EMS, providing funding for 50% of the approved land ambulance costs, and paying 100% of the approved costs for air ambulance, dispatch, base hospitals, First Nation EMS, and for territories without municipal government. Delivery :  Like police and fire services, EMS is predominantly a publicly provided service in Canada.   But businesses have now made some significant in-roads into EMS, primarily  Medavie,  a private corporation based in the Maritimes that describes itself as not-for-profit.  Medavie goes back over 70 years, with its roots in health insurance.  It still operates Medavie Blue Cross with 1,900 employees.  It now a