Skip to main content

Does Canadian business have the financial jelly to win P3 deals?

Even more concern about P3s (public private partnerships) in Britain has emerged.  This time that they might disadvantage English based manufacturing.  

Bombardier lost its position as the favorite for a £1 billion Crossrail train contract when the government moved to fund the deal through a P3, the Guardian reports.  

The problem?  Bombardier's German based competitor, Siemens,  has better access to financing than Bombardier.  "A large company like Siemens will be able to borrow the money to undertake a project of this kind," Tony Travers, director of the Greater London Group at the London School of Economics, warned. 

Indeed, Siemens's superior financial firepower is thought to have been a factor in their victory over Bombardier for a recent Thameslink deal that caused Bombardier to announce it would layoff 1,400 workers at a British factory.  

This dynamic is likely even more relevant to Canada than England. Our local business class is not among the big boys (even compared to British business who have, in fact, pushed into the Ontario hospital industry through P3s).  Indeed, Bombardier (the little boy loser in the English deal) is actually a Canadian based corporation -- one of our biggest.  

So are Canadian corporations likely to have the "superior financial power" that will advantage them in the long term financing deals inherent to P3 privatization?  Their size, at least, suggests otherwise.  

The problem is particularly acute given that the world's financial troubles has made the cost of private financing even more expensive compared to public financing.  

Nevertheless this Zombie staggers on: the Ontario government is launching a major P3 hospital program, just as the English did.

Update October 2011: As it turns out, the Bombardier CEO actually publicly questioned P3s earlier.  Here's a report from May 2010: 

The president and CEO of transportation giant Bombardier has publicly questioned the value of public-private partnerships (P3s).  
 Speaking at a conference in California, Pierre Beaudoin said corporations aren’t always the best choice to finance transit infrastructure projects.
He pointed to the difference in public and private borrowing rates, and highlighted the ongoing impact of the financial crisis on private financing. 
Beaudoin’s caution is rooted in reality. In 2007, Bombardier lost $164 million in the collapse of a P3 to maintain and expand the London subway system.

The privatized tube project has been labeled a “spectacular failure" and “an ill-conceived disaster.”

London taxpayers are now facing service cuts and upgrade delays to pay for the privatization fiasco. Translated media coverage of Beaudoin's remarks


  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Public sector employment in Ontario is far below the rest of Canada

The suggestion that Ontario has a deficit because its public sector is too large does not bear scrutiny. Consider the following. 

Public sector employment has fallen in the last three quarters in Ontario.  Since 2011, public sector employment has been pretty flat, with employment up less than 4 tenths of one percent in the first half of 2015 compared with the first half of 2011.

This contrasts with public sector employment outside of Ontario which has gone up pretty consistently and is now 4.7% higher than it was in the first half of 2011.

Private sector employment has also gone up consistently over that period. In Ontario, it has increased 4.3% since the first half of 2011, while in Canada as a whole it has increased 4.9%.

As a result, public sector employment in Ontario is now shrinking as a percentage of the private sector workforce.  In contrast, in the rest of Canada, it is increasing. Moreover, public sector employment is muchhigher in the rest of Canada than in Ontario.  Indeed as…

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics.

The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs). 

With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed.  

But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea.  Following a recent second OCHU tour wi…

Hospital worker sick leave: too much or too little?

Ontario hospital workers are muchless absent due to illness or disability than hospital workers Canada-wide.  In 2014, Ontario hospital workers were absent 10.2 days due to illness or disability, 2.9 days less than the Canada wide average – i.e. 22% less.  In fact, Ontario hospital workers have had consistently fewer sick days for years.

This is also true if absences due to family or personal responsibilities are included.
Statistics Canada data for the last fifteen years for Canada and Ontario are reported in the chart below, showing Ontario hospital workers are consistently off work less.
Assuming, Ontario accounts for about 38% of the Canada-wide hospital workforce, these figures suggest that the days lost due to illness of injury in Canada excluding Ontario are about 13.6 days per year ([13.6 x 0.68] + [10.2 x 0.38] = 13.1).

In other words, hospital workers in the rest of Canada are absent from work due to illness or disability 1/3 more than Ontario hospital workers. 

In fact, Canad…