Skip to main content

British Tories recognize P3 failure (but not the solution)

After repeated British reports revealing failure  of public private partnerships (P3s) for public infrastructure projects, the British Chancellor has announced a fundamental review of the government's use of P3s (or, as the Brits call them, PFIs) .  

A recent House of Commons Committee report put the cost of capital for a typical PFI project at 8%, which is double the government rate of around 4%.  And for capital intensive projects like new hospital buildings, that adds up to a whole lot of extra cost for the public to swallow.  

Chancellor George Osborne said  “We have consistently voiced concerns about the misuse of PFI in the past and we have already taken steps to reduce costs and improve transparency...We want a new delivery model which draws on private sector innovation but at a lower cost to the taxpayer and with better value for public services.”

The Financial Times suggests that the government wants more "direct" private sector investment in public infrastructure, possibly through pension plans  Instead of banks financing these projects for decades through a mixture of debt and equity, banks would finance projects only until building was complete. 

This would reduce the period of time that the public is stuck covering the high cost of bank borrowing.  Pension plans (or other "direct" investors) would then buy out the debt, once construction was complete, and hold on to it for good long time.  

Of course, the public is still going to have to pay a profit to those "direct" investors for many years.

The financial crisis is driving up the costs of private sector P3 borrowing and even conservative governments are beginning to look for alternatives.  But, even in the face of failure, they are unwilling to give it up completely.

Likely, government authorities in Canada are coming up with all sort of inventive plans to deal with the crisis of private finance of P3s too.  They just aren't telling the public.    

We'll see what the British Tories come up with....


Popular posts from this blog

Public sector employment in Ontario is far below the rest of Canada

The suggestion that Ontario has a deficit because its public sector is too large does not bear scrutiny. Consider the following. 

Public sector employment has fallen in the last three quarters in Ontario.  Since 2011, public sector employment has been pretty flat, with employment up less than 4 tenths of one percent in the first half of 2015 compared with the first half of 2011.

This contrasts with public sector employment outside of Ontario which has gone up pretty consistently and is now 4.7% higher than it was in the first half of 2011.

Private sector employment has also gone up consistently over that period. In Ontario, it has increased 4.3% since the first half of 2011, while in Canada as a whole it has increased 4.9%.

As a result, public sector employment in Ontario is now shrinking as a percentage of the private sector workforce.  In contrast, in the rest of Canada, it is increasing. Moreover, public sector employment is muchhigher in the rest of Canada than in Ontario.  Indeed as…

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics.

The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs). 

With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed.  

But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea.  Following a recent second OCHU tour wi…

Hospital worker sick leave: too much or too little?

Ontario hospital workers are muchless absent due to illness or disability than hospital workers Canada-wide.  In 2014, Ontario hospital workers were absent 10.2 days due to illness or disability, 2.9 days less than the Canada wide average – i.e. 22% less.  In fact, Ontario hospital workers have had consistently fewer sick days for years.

This is also true if absences due to family or personal responsibilities are included.
Statistics Canada data for the last fifteen years for Canada and Ontario are reported in the chart below, showing Ontario hospital workers are consistently off work less.
Assuming, Ontario accounts for about 38% of the Canada-wide hospital workforce, these figures suggest that the days lost due to illness of injury in Canada excluding Ontario are about 13.6 days per year ([13.6 x 0.68] + [10.2 x 0.38] = 13.1).

In other words, hospital workers in the rest of Canada are absent from work due to illness or disability 1/3 more than Ontario hospital workers. 

In fact, Canad…