Skip to main content

AAA credit rating may fall under weight of P3 debt

The conservative newspaper The Telegraph reports that an economic think-tank, The Integenerational Foundation, has found that the total cost of  British P3s (public private partnerships) has reached such great heights that it is threatening Britain’s AAA credit rating.

The credit rating determines how cheaply the Government can raise money on the international markets. The lower it goes, the more it costs the government to borrow money.

The think tank reports that the P3 debts are £239 billion ($380 million), 80 per cent higher than the report of £131.5 billion in P3 debts released this week by the government in its new "Whole of Government Accounts".

The think tank warned the cost of P3s has been under-appreciated. “Such build-ups clearly put Britain’s AAA credit rating at risk by adding over a quarter to the country’s £1 trillion national debt,” said Angus Hanton, co-founder of Intergenerational Foundation.

Reportedly, P3 debt is up to £13,000 per taxpaying household.

A Government spokesman said the higher figure of £239 billion covers the total cost of P3 repayments. The lower £131.5 billion figure in the government accounts leaves out costs for maintenance, cleaning and other services related to the P3 deals.

David Parker, author of the report and Emeritus Professor of Economics at the Cranfield School of Management, said “It seems clear that decisions made over the last decade or so have been made selfishly. This has involved providing new infrastructure now, while handing down to our children a significant proportion of the costs of provision.”

The  British government conceded last week that a number of P3 hospitals will get a £1.5 billion taxpayer bail-out because of the unsustainable costs of P3 contracts.

Critics of P3s in Ontario and Britain have long claimed that P3s were far too expensive.  Regardless, Ontario continues on with privatized P3 hospitals -- while preparing to slash vital public services with the help of the Drummond Commission.  

Bay Street, at least, will be happy.


Popular posts from this blog

Public sector employment in Ontario is far below the rest of Canada

The suggestion that Ontario has a deficit because its public sector is too large does not bear scrutiny. Consider the following. 

Public sector employment has fallen in the last three quarters in Ontario.  Since 2011, public sector employment has been pretty flat, with employment up less than 4 tenths of one percent in the first half of 2015 compared with the first half of 2011.

This contrasts with public sector employment outside of Ontario which has gone up pretty consistently and is now 4.7% higher than it was in the first half of 2011.

Private sector employment has also gone up consistently over that period. In Ontario, it has increased 4.3% since the first half of 2011, while in Canada as a whole it has increased 4.9%.

As a result, public sector employment in Ontario is now shrinking as a percentage of the private sector workforce.  In contrast, in the rest of Canada, it is increasing. Moreover, public sector employment is muchhigher in the rest of Canada than in Ontario.  Indeed as…

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics.

The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs). 

With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed.  

But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea.  Following a recent second OCHU tour wi…

Hospital worker sick leave: too much or too little?

Ontario hospital workers are muchless absent due to illness or disability than hospital workers Canada-wide.  In 2014, Ontario hospital workers were absent 10.2 days due to illness or disability, 2.9 days less than the Canada wide average – i.e. 22% less.  In fact, Ontario hospital workers have had consistently fewer sick days for years.

This is also true if absences due to family or personal responsibilities are included.
Statistics Canada data for the last fifteen years for Canada and Ontario are reported in the chart below, showing Ontario hospital workers are consistently off work less.
Assuming, Ontario accounts for about 38% of the Canada-wide hospital workforce, these figures suggest that the days lost due to illness of injury in Canada excluding Ontario are about 13.6 days per year ([13.6 x 0.68] + [10.2 x 0.38] = 13.1).

In other words, hospital workers in the rest of Canada are absent from work due to illness or disability 1/3 more than Ontario hospital workers. 

In fact, Canad…