Skip to main content

Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes from the Liberals on bargaining and health

The Throne Speech from the new Liberal government of Kathleen Wynne sticks fairly close to previous Liberal policy.

But it does make a few noteworthy new turns.

With the past Liberal government, the claim was they would expand home care. The problem was their expansion was more imaginary than real -- and the claimed expansion was served up as justification for real cuts in hospital and long term care. There is barely any change here:
"Along with all parties in the legislature, it (the government) understands the pressing need to expand access to home care in Ontario. And so your government will continue to expand the support available to people in their homes, and to address the needs of men and women across Ontario currently waiting for the home care services they require."
So, if we take them at their word, they will "continue" their existing policy. Whoopee.  The good news? At least there is some recognition here that they need to address the needs of people who are waiting for home care service, i.e. that there are unmet needs. The suggested change is so slight, however, it is perhaps foolish to hope to see much sign of it.

The speech goes on to add, "Your government will also continue to expand access to mental health services and support efforts to reduce stigma for men and women coping with mental illness."

This is supposed to be a sop to the Progressive Conservatives who have made some noises about mental health care. Well, if so, this may not amount to much.  PC leader, Tim Hudak, lost any leverage he may have had when he made clear that he is sticking to his far-right script -- he is not going to play ball with the Liberals and wants an election PDQ. 

 In any case, if this was a sop it wasn't much of one -- all the Liberals promised is to continue what they (say they) are already doing.

Somewhat more promisingly, the Liberals moved slightly towards more revenue for health care from the corporate sector:
"A renewed partnership with business, educational institutions, not-for-profits and labour will be at the heart of your government's plans to build a modern, competitive and dynamic economy.  And so your new government will work with the opposition and small business to explore an increase in the Employer Health Tax exemption threshold."
New funding from the Employer Health Tax would be welcome, but the promise is couched in so much caution that it is hard to get very excited.  

Also somewhat interesting is the call for a "renewed partnership" with business and labour.  There was never any question that the Liberals were (junior) partners with their Bay Street pals, but partnership with labour isn't the word that comes to mind when you consider their activities since this past summer (when they brought in their new public sector bargaining policy and tried to impose "agreements" on public sector workers).  

There is also some slight recognition of free collective bargaining and fair interest arbitration. 
"As your government moves forward, Ontario's labour force will be treated fairly and with respect. It will sit down with its partners across all sectors to build a sustainable model for wage negotiation, respectful of both collective bargaining and a fair and transparent interest arbitration process, so that the brightness of our shared future is not clouded by the indisputable economic realities of our time."
But the recognition is so slight that, in fact, all sides claimed victory. The Association of Municipalities of Ontario, who are campaigning for employer biased changes to the interest arbitration system (although they only have themselves and the government to blame for their self-proclaimed problems), put out a news release trumpeting some of these very words. 

We'll see if the Wynne government actually does respect collective bargaining and if it does sit down with labour to develop new models of wage negotiation that actually do respect free collective bargaining.

In any case, all of this is only words.  And in a political world, words get lost pretty quickly.

We've gotten to this new situation through some significant efforts by working people in difficult circumstances (efforts that we can be proud of), but the struggles in the next few months by working people and corporations will determine if we go back to what we had, or move on to something different.


Popular posts from this blog

Public sector employment in Ontario is far below the rest of Canada

The suggestion that Ontario has a deficit because its public sector is too large does not bear scrutiny. Consider the following. 

Public sector employment has fallen in the last three quarters in Ontario.  Since 2011, public sector employment has been pretty flat, with employment up less than 4 tenths of one percent in the first half of 2015 compared with the first half of 2011.

This contrasts with public sector employment outside of Ontario which has gone up pretty consistently and is now 4.7% higher than it was in the first half of 2011.

Private sector employment has also gone up consistently over that period. In Ontario, it has increased 4.3% since the first half of 2011, while in Canada as a whole it has increased 4.9%.

As a result, public sector employment in Ontario is now shrinking as a percentage of the private sector workforce.  In contrast, in the rest of Canada, it is increasing. Moreover, public sector employment is muchhigher in the rest of Canada than in Ontario.  Indeed as…

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics.

The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs). 

With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed.  

But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea.  Following a recent second OCHU tour wi…

Hospital worker sick leave: too much or too little?

Ontario hospital workers are muchless absent due to illness or disability than hospital workers Canada-wide.  In 2014, Ontario hospital workers were absent 10.2 days due to illness or disability, 2.9 days less than the Canada wide average – i.e. 22% less.  In fact, Ontario hospital workers have had consistently fewer sick days for years.

This is also true if absences due to family or personal responsibilities are included.
Statistics Canada data for the last fifteen years for Canada and Ontario are reported in the chart below, showing Ontario hospital workers are consistently off work less.
Assuming, Ontario accounts for about 38% of the Canada-wide hospital workforce, these figures suggest that the days lost due to illness of injury in Canada excluding Ontario are about 13.6 days per year ([13.6 x 0.68] + [10.2 x 0.38] = 13.1).

In other words, hospital workers in the rest of Canada are absent from work due to illness or disability 1/3 more than Ontario hospital workers. 

In fact, Canad…