Skip to main content

Non-ambulance corporations to take over more EMS work?

The Minister of Health and LTC has strongly endorsed the restructuring of the patient transfer industry in the South West LHIN.  This may set a new model for the private corporations that often move patients between health care facilities in vehicles that look, for all the world, like ambulances -- but are not.  

For the first time, a LHIN-wide patient transfer provider has been chosen, with the goal of standardizing equipment and staffing qualifications. Health Minister Deb Matthews states:
"This non-emergency transportation approach is precisely the type of collaborative effort that will help transform the health care system in Ontario. Standardized equipment and qualifications will lead to enhanced quality of care and safety for all the people hospitalized in the South West LHIN."
This restructuring is, no doubt, a response to the scandals uncovered in the private transfer industry over two years ago by the CBC and the provincial Ombudsman.  

Ontario residents would be better off taking a taxi to a hospital than one of the privately owned vehicles used to transfer hundreds of thousands of non-critical patients each year, provincial Ombudsman Andre Marin concluded.

It's allowed private companies to charge hundreds of dollars per patient for transports in old, beat-up ambulances operated by "kids'' with no medical training.  "They place people's lives in serious jeopardy,'' Marin said.

"These vehicles - that for all intents and purposes are ambulances - are completely without any rules,'' Marin said. "It's astounding.''

About half a million patients transfers between health care facilities occur each year in Ontario, so this represents a significant amount of work. With health care centralization and specialization on the rise, more of this work will come.

Most patient transfers were provided by highly regulated ambulance services until 2000 when a Progressive Conservative government introduced legislation allowing hospitals to use for-profit "patient transfer" companies rather than ambulances to move patients between hospitals or long-term care facilities if the patient was in stable condition. 

That turned into the disaster uncovered by the CBC and the Ombudsman over two years ago.

A CBC radio documentary interviewed patient transfer attendants and found that while some had qualifications similar to paramedics, many had no medical training beyond a basic CPR certificate. They were often paid in the range of $11 to $13 an hour.

Workers within the industry who expressed concern to their dispatch operators about their patients’ safety were routinely suspended or fired.

Workers recounted experiences to the CBC such as trucks catching on fire and lug nuts shearing off wheels. In both of those cases, patients were aboard the trucks. One worker said she was ordered by her dispatcher to drop off a homeless patient in a back alley of Toronto.

After the scandal came out, the Liberal government promised to introduce legislation "at the earliest opportunity'' that would set standards and requirements for the industry if they were re-elected.

"We became aware that people thought they were in an ambulance when they weren't, they thought that the driver had skills that they didn't have,'' Health Minister Deb Matthews said in an interview.  "So regulating to make sure that they meet certain standards is what we will do.  Exactly what those standards will be is something we're going to be working on.''
Well, it's been two years, and there has been no legislation, so this sort of private sector restructuring may be all we will be getting.

But it falls far short of the legislation promised by the Minister two years ago when the scandal of the private sector transfer companies was uncovered.

Indeed the restructuring looks designed to encourage more EMS work to migrate to the private transfer companies. The release announcing the restructuring states:

"Prior to the implementation of this LHIN-wide approach to non-emergency transportation service delivery, there were no established standards to follow, and various transportation providers, including ambulances (EMS), were called upon to transport patients. The primary mandate of EMS is to be available to respond to community emergency calls. Non-emergency transportation calls to EMS could reduce the availability of EMS in the event of an emergency."
This development adds to concerns that a regulatory college (that could elevate some patient transport workers to "paramedic" status) will encourage more EMS work to migrate to such private providers, sooner or later.  A major pre-occupation for the government has been to move work from higher paid workers to lower paid workers. 

Given the Minister's strong support for the South West plans, similar restructuring may be coming elsewhere in the province. 

The EMS Chiefs seem to be on board too, at least judging from the support from the vice-president of the Ontario Association of Paramedic Chiefs, Neal Roberts who said,"EMS services fully support this development."

Bottom line: this is one more attempt by the Liberal government to patch up yet another failed health care privatization experiment (P3 hospitals, e-Health, Ornge, chemotherapy mixing) with not much more than duct tape.  

The idea for the government behind these privatization experiments seems to be this: if it blew up in your face the first time, change a few details and try it again. 

Photo: Alexkess (New South Wales)


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Public sector employment in Ontario is far below the rest of Canada

The suggestion that Ontario has a deficit because its public sector is too large does not bear scrutiny. Consider the following. 

Public sector employment has fallen in the last three quarters in Ontario.  Since 2011, public sector employment has been pretty flat, with employment up less than 4 tenths of one percent in the first half of 2015 compared with the first half of 2011.

This contrasts with public sector employment outside of Ontario which has gone up pretty consistently and is now 4.7% higher than it was in the first half of 2011.

Private sector employment has also gone up consistently over that period. In Ontario, it has increased 4.3% since the first half of 2011, while in Canada as a whole it has increased 4.9%.

As a result, public sector employment in Ontario is now shrinking as a percentage of the private sector workforce.  In contrast, in the rest of Canada, it is increasing. Moreover, public sector employment is muchhigher in the rest of Canada than in Ontario.  Indeed as…

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics.

The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs). 

With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed.  

But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea.  Following a recent second OCHU tour wi…

Hospital worker sick leave: too much or too little?

Ontario hospital workers are muchless absent due to illness or disability than hospital workers Canada-wide.  In 2014, Ontario hospital workers were absent 10.2 days due to illness or disability, 2.9 days less than the Canada wide average – i.e. 22% less.  In fact, Ontario hospital workers have had consistently fewer sick days for years.

This is also true if absences due to family or personal responsibilities are included.
Statistics Canada data for the last fifteen years for Canada and Ontario are reported in the chart below, showing Ontario hospital workers are consistently off work less.
Assuming, Ontario accounts for about 38% of the Canada-wide hospital workforce, these figures suggest that the days lost due to illness of injury in Canada excluding Ontario are about 13.6 days per year ([13.6 x 0.68] + [10.2 x 0.38] = 13.1).

In other words, hospital workers in the rest of Canada are absent from work due to illness or disability 1/3 more than Ontario hospital workers. 

In fact, Canad…