Skip to main content

Ontario Liberals fail to protect health care in trade deal with Europe

Ontario Liberals fail to protect public health in CETA trade deal

While the Harper Conservative government has pushed ahead with its Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) with the European Union, the Ontario Liberal government has failed to protect public health care.

Under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) protection for public health care was initially supposed to be provided through the Annex II Social Services Reservations.  Annex II protects social services “maintained for a public purpose”.

Unfortunately, the meaning of “public purpose” is disputed and the provision may not provide protection where there is private sector involvement in health care. 

To clarify that health services delivered as public services are excluded from NAFTA, the parties negotiated a general reservation in 1996.  This addition to NAFTA's Annex I meant that services provided by provinces since 1994 would be excluded from NAFTA liberalization.

With CETA, however, general reservations like those seen in Annex I under NAFTA
for public services are not included.  Instead, the provinces must name the specific services that they want excluded from the liberalization ratchet that locks-in privatization.

This means that we will be left only with the weaker protection of public health care provided by Annex II, including its lack of clarity over the meaning of “public purpose”. 

Worse, the Ontario government is moving more public health care services to private, for-profit delivery through public private partnerships, private surgical and diagnostic clinics, and by underfunding public health care services and leaving more care to private purchase (for those who can afford it).  As a result the separation of public and private care has become much less clear, making the protection provided by Annex II more uncertain.

Impact on drug costs

The trade deal will increase the cost of pharmaceutical drugs by delaying the release
of generic drugs.  Current estimates place this extra cost to the public at $2.8 billion per year.  Notably, while drug costs have sky-rocketed since the 1990s, significant relief has been provided in the last several years by new generic drugs becoming available.    

Expansion of Medicare threatened 

CETA allows private corporations to bring charges against the public through international commercial tribunals if public health care is expanded in some way, e.g.
if government establishes a universal and comprehensive public drug plan, or even
just brings a privatized health service back into the public sector.  This will stymie, or,
at best, add extra costs to efforts to effectively reform our health care system. 

What needs to be done

Trade agreements negotiated by Conservative governments have strengthened corporate power at the expense of the democratic control of working people.  Since such deals began in the 1980s, the bargaining power of working people has diminished and inequality has increased, here and in the United States.

As a very basic minimum, the Ontario Liberal government should at least be willing
to specifically and explicitly ensure that nothing in CETA shall be construed to apply to measures adopted or maintained by a party with respect to health care or public health insurance. 


  1. Hey,I highly appreciate your writing.I'd like to share little point with you.My thought is this: healthcare really ins't a traditional market commodity in the sense that I Phones or cars or massage services are it doesn't correspond to supply and demand in the same way, this is corroborated by the fact that although Private Healthcare advocates always tell us competition will lower prices and improve quality, private healthcare coasts have only risen in the last decades. not only this but people having healthcare is of such national importance that treating it as another marketable good seems like a inadequate and frankly wrongheaded approach.Thank you so much!!!
    medical device consultant 


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Public sector employment in Ontario is far below the rest of Canada

The suggestion that Ontario has a deficit because its public sector is too large does not bear scrutiny. Consider the following. 

Public sector employment has fallen in the last three quarters in Ontario.  Since 2011, public sector employment has been pretty flat, with employment up less than 4 tenths of one percent in the first half of 2015 compared with the first half of 2011.

This contrasts with public sector employment outside of Ontario which has gone up pretty consistently and is now 4.7% higher than it was in the first half of 2011.

Private sector employment has also gone up consistently over that period. In Ontario, it has increased 4.3% since the first half of 2011, while in Canada as a whole it has increased 4.9%.

As a result, public sector employment in Ontario is now shrinking as a percentage of the private sector workforce.  In contrast, in the rest of Canada, it is increasing. Moreover, public sector employment is muchhigher in the rest of Canada than in Ontario.  Indeed as…

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics.

The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs). 

With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed.  

But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea.  Following a recent second OCHU tour wi…

Hospital worker sick leave: too much or too little?

Ontario hospital workers are muchless absent due to illness or disability than hospital workers Canada-wide.  In 2014, Ontario hospital workers were absent 10.2 days due to illness or disability, 2.9 days less than the Canada wide average – i.e. 22% less.  In fact, Ontario hospital workers have had consistently fewer sick days for years.

This is also true if absences due to family or personal responsibilities are included.
Statistics Canada data for the last fifteen years for Canada and Ontario are reported in the chart below, showing Ontario hospital workers are consistently off work less.
Assuming, Ontario accounts for about 38% of the Canada-wide hospital workforce, these figures suggest that the days lost due to illness of injury in Canada excluding Ontario are about 13.6 days per year ([13.6 x 0.68] + [10.2 x 0.38] = 13.1).

In other words, hospital workers in the rest of Canada are absent from work due to illness or disability 1/3 more than Ontario hospital workers. 

In fact, Canad…