Skip to main content

Cascading cuts result in new home care restructuring

The government is coordinating cascading efforts to move patients from organizations where more care is provided to where less care is provided.  
Home care services removed from CCACs

 For hospitals, government funding models and directives have long focused on removing less ill patients. 

In long term care homes, the government quietly raised the criteria for eligibility for the waiting list. They also stopped providing the 'case mix measure' which was the key measure of the increasing illness and acuity of long term care residents. Regardless it is now obvious acuity in the homes is rising rapidly.

But these restrictions on eligibility to hospital and long term care homes have also dramatically increased demand for home care services provided by Community Care Access Centres (CCACs).  CCACs are facing both more demand and much more ill patients. 

 The CCACs claim the number of their high care need patients have increased 73% between 2009/10 and 2013/14. As a percentage of total patients, high care need patients have increased from 37% to 64%, while patients with less intensive care needs has dropped from 63% to 36%.

Home care is dramatically changing.

The government has responded to this by eliminating a whole class of "clients" from CCAC care. 

The "Collaborative Care Model" will see less ill home care patients transfer from the CCAC to Community Support Service agencies (CSS).  The CSS agencies will take over clients who are stable, independent, and have low to moderate care needs  CCACs will maintain care for sicker patients (post acute or complex patients). Indeed moving to more acutely ill patients is required by the HBAM funding system.   

In March 2014, the government enacted a new regulation  to allow Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) to directly fund designated CSS organizations to deliver personal support services. These regulations came into effect on July 1, 2014. Specifically Regulation 386/99 under the Home Care and CommunityServices Act, 1994  was amended to enable lighter needs clients to receive personal support services (PSS) through selected CSS agencies by extending the eligibility criteria and service maximum to all approved agencies. 

The regulation establishes (barring exceptional circumstances) a maximum number of hours of personal support and homemaking services :
  1. 120 hours, in the first 30 days of service.
  2. 90 hours, in any subsequent 30-day period.

Despite this seemingly generous maximum, the reports we have received is that the changeover to the new regime has gone with reductions in the amount of care.

The CSS organization can directly take on a client now - there is no need to go through the CCAC (the slogan is there "is no wrong door"). 

LHINs  are awarding money for these  new contracts right now.  The Hamilton-Niagara LHIN  recently planned to reallocate $4 million in CCAC funding in 2015/16 to CSS providers in supportive housing and assisted living settings.  That is supposed to provide 127,795 hours of care (at, apparently, a total cost of $23.47 per hour). The providers named were the March of Dimes in Niagara and Hamilton, St. Joseph's Homecare, AbleLiving Services, Capability Support Services, Participation House Brantford,  and Good Sheppard Hamilton. 

The LHIN notes that "In late summer 2014, the HNHB CCAC informed the HNHB LHIN that in order to accommodate increased referrals from hospitals and community for persons needing higher levels of care the CCAC would need to transition persons assessed as requiring lower levels of care to community support agencies."

Photo: John Piercy, a picture of a painting a Varadero Airport, Cuba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).    For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.   But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending.  Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th
Post a Comment
Read more

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2. 
Post a Comment
Read more

Paramedic Services in Canada: Structure, Privatization, Unionization and other issues

Governance and Funding :  While police and fire services are usually municipal services, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are typically controlled by provincial governments.  In Ontario, regional municipal governments have responsibility for delivering and funding EMS.  But even in Ontario the province plays a key role, strictly regulating EMS, providing funding for 50% of the approved land ambulance costs, and paying 100% of the approved costs for air ambulance, dispatch, base hospitals, First Nation EMS, and for territories without municipal government. Delivery :  Like police and fire services, EMS is predominantly a publicly provided service in Canada.   But businesses have now made some significant in-roads into EMS, primarily  Medavie,  a private corporation based in the Maritimes that describes itself as not-for-profit.  Medavie goes back over 70 years, with its roots in health insurance.  It still operates Medavie Blue Cross with 1,900 employees.  It now a
Post a Comment
Read more