Skip to main content

LHINs fighting for their existence

In response to the sharp attacks on the Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) from the Progressive Conservative party,  some LHIN officials have begun to fight for their existence in the lead-up to this fall's provincial election.  


Here's some comments  from the Northeast LHIN CEO, Louise Paquette:


"Decision-makers in Toronto can't begin to understand the challenges faced by patients in Northeastern Ontario. In this region, although the LHINs are still in their infancy, we have benefited from local decision-making.  It's incumbent on us as Northerners to make sure the power stays with us."


Paquette said with the provincial election being held this fall, she's hopeful the next elected government will continue to understand the value of local decision-making.


Pacquette is treading into some very political waters.  She doesn't, however, go quite so far as Gary Switzer, CEO  of the Erie-St. Clair LHIN, who frankly declared during a dispute in August that Progressive Conservative leader Tim Hudak was "making this crap up".  


It is inappropriate for LHIN bosses to join the political debate.  But it was probably inevitable: the LHINs were designed so that the government could distance itself from unpopular health care decisions.  They were designed to hand over political decisions to non-politicians. 


LHIN officials may figure that they have little to lose by getting involved in the politics, given that the Progressive Conservatives say they will shut the LHINs down.  And even more so as the Progressive Conservative attacks on the LHINs are pretty much cheap shots -- laughably suggesting health care services can be coordinated without incurring costs.  


The debate needs to be on a more serious level.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…