Skip to main content

Liberals open to more private health care delivery

The Ontario Medical Association called last week for more surgeries and other work to be performed outside of public hospitals.  


This proposal from the OMA is old news. However, in this case they specifically pleaded that that their proposal not get caught up in "over politicized language" about the privatization of health care.  


Yes, I am sure they don't want this to become part of the debate about privatization.  But I am defeated when I try to think of this in other terms.  If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it is probably ... (a duck).


The Progressive Conservatives (PCs) supported such a plan in the last election, citing some similar claims about cost savings. It didn't seem to do them any good.  But no doubt they will be down for more -- their program is privatization friendly.   


More surprising is the welcome offered to the OMA proposal by the current Liberal Health Minister, Deb Matthews.  Here's the account from the Sun chain: 

 "We're not opposed," she said. "We support the need to deliver services in the community. That's why we have a lot more dialysis, for example, out of hospitals. It's really all about getting the right balance."


The Liberals need to distinguish themselves from the PCs if they are planning to campaign as the saviors of medicare from Conservative privatizers.  On this one, they are not doing it.   


They also have to figure out a way to say to stop saying yes to funding requests from the docs.   


These guy have driven up their funding by a huge amount since the Liberals got in power: e.g.  from $6.7 billion for OHIP payments in the 2003-4 Budget Estimates to $12.5 billion in the 2011-12 Budget Estimates.  That's a couple of drops under a $ 6 billion increase -- an 87% increase.  That one line item  increase alone accounts for a significant portion of the total increase in health care funding.


It's also worth noting that these private facilities ("IHFs") that OMA so much wants to expand have seen an 82% increase over the same period.  


Those are pretty big increases  -- and we can't afford them. 





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…