Skip to main content

When a wage freeze is not a wage freeze

In its dispute with teachers, the Ontario Liberal government sometimes tries to claim that one union's offer of a wage freeze is not in fact a wage freeze.

The rationale here is that even though no teacher would get a general wage increase for two years, some junior teachers would progress up the wage grid as they accumulate service.

This is an unusual take on wages.  And as noted in an earlier post, it is particularly peculiar point for the Liberals to harp on as they actually have agreed to service based pay increases in their deal with the catholic teachers association.

But the Liberal argument is also a rather one-sided interpretation of a wage freeze.

Pay based on service doesn't just go up -- it also goes down.  Pay based on service gradually increases as junior workers gain experience, but it also falls sharply when senior workers retire or quit and are replaced by a new worker.  The "gradual increase" and the "sharp fall" in pay is especially true for professions (like teaching) which have long, multi-year pay grids with a large wage differentiation between junior and senior employees.

If changes in service based pay don't even out for an employer in any given year, it will even out over time: older workers will sooner or later be replaced by younger workers.  The government knows this.  But that doesn't stop the Liberals.

If they want to freeze wages, one could just as easily ask why don't they freeze wages at the rates of the teachers who are retiring, rather than bring in teachers earning much less. But no, the Liberals only want to freeze the increases, not the decreases.

One might also ask why the Liberals think it is right to pay workers doing the same job so much less based largely on the age of the workers.

Finally it is interesting to note that the Liberal approach did not hamper the brand new tentative agreement between the colleges and their teachers, which  -- according to the colleges -- continues service based pay increases and imposes no concessions on the teachers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ford government plans to deepen privatization of hospital and home care services: Bill 175

The proposed reforms through Bill 175 will privatize health care services, weaken public oversight, remove legislative protections, undermine home care working conditions, and unleash an untested, home care experiment. Chaos beckons.Bill 175 is permissive, allowing a laissez-faire framework for home and community care.  It repeals the more detailed Home Care and Community Services Act, 1994 and leaves most details to policy or regulation. Deviously, the government has made the Bill (Connecting People to Home and Community Care Act, 2020) little more than an empty shell that doesn't even establish a new home and community act.  So, for example, the Home Care Bill of Rights is not in the proposed legislation.  Instead, it may be put into regulation.  This approach removes the public accountability that comes with legislation.  Regulations and policies are changed with little public consultation.  One would think that in today’s world a Home Care Bill of Rights would not be removed fr…

Ontario revenue up $1.5 billion since November - but no new health care spending announced

Ontario’s third quarter finances came out yesterday.  They confirm that although planned health care funding has increased $404.1 million since the 2019/20 Budget, no further increase has been achieved since November's Ontario Economic Outlook and Fiscal Review. 

While the lack of new progress since the fall is disappointing, the $404.1 million is a 0.64% funding increasefor health care since the Budget.  Total health care funding for 2019/20 is now planned to increase 3.1% since 2018/19.
Also notable: Total revenue is projected to be $157.2 billion in 2019–20, $3.1 billion higher than the 2019 Budget projection and $1.68 billion higher than expected in the fall 2019 Ontario Economic Outlook and Fiscal Review. Program expenses are $2.45 billion higher than in the 2019/20 Budget. The total increase for the year compared to last year is $3.9 billion (so far).  So, in the Budget, program funding was increased 0.91%, while, since then, program funding was increased a …

Ford government will not spend $2 billion of its budget -- deficit on track to fall $3 billion

As usual, the provincial government is under-spending its (revised) budget.  Based on figures for provincial expenditures for the the first nine months of the fiscal year, the government-funded Financial Accountability Office (FAO) estimates that the government will under-spend its budget by about $2 billion this year.
While that sounds like quite a bit -- it is actually less than usual.  Over the last ten years, the province has spent $3.3 billion less than budgeted on average.


Combined with the expected non-use of the government’s $1 billion "reserve" (the reserve is an amount set aside every year for unexpected expenses), the FAO estimates the deficit will be only $6.1 billion, almost $3 billion less than predicted in the government’s own, very recent third-quarter report. 
Health care expenditures are under-spent by $400 million (0.9%) through the first three quarters of the fiscal year, primarily due to under-spending on LHINs for hospitals, LTC, home care, etc. (0.5…