Skip to main content

Hudak PCPO promises to privatize, cut services, and restrict workers' rights.

Here is a list of the main items regarding labour in the Progressive Conservatives policy manual ("Changebook") released on Sunday:


Labour laws:

"We will make Ontario’s labour laws fairer for union members and taxpayers. We will change Ontario’s labour laws to give union members more flexibility and a greater voice. We will give all individuals the right to a secret ballot in certification votes. We will introduce paycheque protection so union members are not forced to pay fees towards political causes they don’t support. Unions will be required to be transparent and open with their financial information, just as businesses and charities are."




Goodness gracious, I hope they did not pay a lot of money to whoever wrote this. Except for the part about making it more difficult for construction workers (who have "card certification") to form a union, it's a model of vagueness.   Nevertheless, details be damned, it's clear enough that they intend to reduce the collective power of working people.  


Privatization. Special attention is meted out for support workers in the public sector:


"We will introduce initiatives requiring public sector unions to compete for government contracts, where appropriate. For example, if we can improve service delivery and get a better deal for taxpayers, in areas such as support services like food preparation or laundry in our public institutions, we will require public sector unions to compete for government contracts."


This is an old tactic.  Focus on attacking the lowest paid workers in the public sector in the hope that this group (who are mostly women) will be the easiest target.  CUPE represents many support workers and the public sector is one of the few areas where support workers have been able to win a modest, but reasonable living standard.  This is a very nasty attempt to end all that, by a party closely associated with the big private corporations that stand to make big profits from the policy.


The fact, however, that the Conservatives only flag groups like support workers, shows they are nervous about privatization.  The previous Mike Harris Conservative introduced the same compulsory contracting out model in home care --and that has proved disastrous for everyone involved (politicians included).


Bottom line: the Conservatives have a burning urge to privatize. This policy will open up new profit opportunities for the corporations that back the Conservatives and many CUPE members are specifically targeted by the policy.  We are on the front lines, once again!


Cutbacks to the public sector:


"We will reduce the size of the bureaucracy. This will be achieved primarily by not filling vacant positions. We will protect vital front line positions in health, education, and public safety." 
"Outside of our priority public services of health and education that will grow, we will find savings of two cents on the dollar, every year on government spending. Two percent – this is realistic and achievable."


As discussed in an earlier note, their idea of "growing" health care is to cut. So all other public service that don't even have that protection are in for more than a spot of trouble!


But note, their careful edging ("protect vital front line positions") suggests they are worried that this could get them dumped into the bin with Mike Harris.


Public sector bargaining:


"We will bring public sector paycheques in line with private sector standards. We will work with our public sector partners to develop a pay and benefits package that is fair, but that recognizes the enormous financial hole that Dalton McGuinty’s Liberals have dug. We must address this gap to protect Ontario’s long-term financial stability."


No surprise here -- they intend to reduce the wages and working conditions of public sector workers.  The fact that public sector wage settlements have fallen behind inflation is of no account.  Real wages are not falling fast enough.


Workers who have had their right to strike removed  and who have to settle contract disputes through interest arbitration (e.g. police, firefighters, hospital workers) are singled out for special punishment, however:


"In recent years, arbitrators have awarded unions excessive contracts, even as Ontario has been saddled  with record deficits and a struggling economy. Ontario families get stuck with the bill. We will fix this costly problem. We will require arbitrators to respect the ability of taxpayers to pay, and take into account local circumstances. We will make the system more transparent and accountable by requiring arbitrators to explain the reasons for their decisions. When arbitrators make decisions that cost Ontario families money, those families deserve to know why. We will require that clear and tight time frames be met by arbitrators so that the provincial and local governments can budget accordingly."


Most of this is pretty vague as well.  (For example, arbitrators already consider "ability to pay" - So what might the Conservatives mean when they say "We will require arbitrators to respect the ability of taxpayers to pay"?)  But the intent to go after workers stuck with interest arbitration is unmistakable.


This will go down just fine among the tiny percentage of Ontarians who sit around corporate board rooms.  The problem for the Conservatives is the policy will primarily hurt people they would like to win over: police officers,  firefighters, paramedics, and nurses.  And that's a lot of people.

Comments

  1. The global recession was hard on economies around the world. Ontario worked with people when others would have cut them loose. The economy is back on track. Ontario jobs are coming back and growth is returning. See the progress report here: http://bit.ly/k2ADga

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hudak cannot be trusted.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).    For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.   But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending.  Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2. 

Paramedic Services in Canada: Structure, Privatization, Unionization and other issues

Governance and Funding :  While police and fire services are usually municipal services, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are typically controlled by provincial governments.  In Ontario, regional municipal governments have responsibility for delivering and funding EMS.  But even in Ontario the province plays a key role, strictly regulating EMS, providing funding for 50% of the approved land ambulance costs, and paying 100% of the approved costs for air ambulance, dispatch, base hospitals, First Nation EMS, and for territories without municipal government. Delivery :  Like police and fire services, EMS is predominantly a publicly provided service in Canada.   But businesses have now made some significant in-roads into EMS, primarily  Medavie,  a private corporation based in the Maritimes that describes itself as not-for-profit.  Medavie goes back over 70 years, with its roots in health insurance.  It still operates Medavie Blue Cross with 1,900 employees.  It now a