Skip to main content

Hudak PCPO promises to privatize, cut services, and restrict workers' rights.

Here is a list of the main items regarding labour in the Progressive Conservatives policy manual ("Changebook") released on Sunday:


Labour laws:

"We will make Ontario’s labour laws fairer for union members and taxpayers. We will change Ontario’s labour laws to give union members more flexibility and a greater voice. We will give all individuals the right to a secret ballot in certification votes. We will introduce paycheque protection so union members are not forced to pay fees towards political causes they don’t support. Unions will be required to be transparent and open with their financial information, just as businesses and charities are."




Goodness gracious, I hope they did not pay a lot of money to whoever wrote this. Except for the part about making it more difficult for construction workers (who have "card certification") to form a union, it's a model of vagueness.   Nevertheless, details be damned, it's clear enough that they intend to reduce the collective power of working people.  


Privatization. Special attention is meted out for support workers in the public sector:


"We will introduce initiatives requiring public sector unions to compete for government contracts, where appropriate. For example, if we can improve service delivery and get a better deal for taxpayers, in areas such as support services like food preparation or laundry in our public institutions, we will require public sector unions to compete for government contracts."


This is an old tactic.  Focus on attacking the lowest paid workers in the public sector in the hope that this group (who are mostly women) will be the easiest target.  CUPE represents many support workers and the public sector is one of the few areas where support workers have been able to win a modest, but reasonable living standard.  This is a very nasty attempt to end all that, by a party closely associated with the big private corporations that stand to make big profits from the policy.


The fact, however, that the Conservatives only flag groups like support workers, shows they are nervous about privatization.  The previous Mike Harris Conservative introduced the same compulsory contracting out model in home care --and that has proved disastrous for everyone involved (politicians included).


Bottom line: the Conservatives have a burning urge to privatize. This policy will open up new profit opportunities for the corporations that back the Conservatives and many CUPE members are specifically targeted by the policy.  We are on the front lines, once again!


Cutbacks to the public sector:


"We will reduce the size of the bureaucracy. This will be achieved primarily by not filling vacant positions. We will protect vital front line positions in health, education, and public safety." 
"Outside of our priority public services of health and education that will grow, we will find savings of two cents on the dollar, every year on government spending. Two percent – this is realistic and achievable."


As discussed in an earlier note, their idea of "growing" health care is to cut. So all other public service that don't even have that protection are in for more than a spot of trouble!


But note, their careful edging ("protect vital front line positions") suggests they are worried that this could get them dumped into the bin with Mike Harris.


Public sector bargaining:


"We will bring public sector paycheques in line with private sector standards. We will work with our public sector partners to develop a pay and benefits package that is fair, but that recognizes the enormous financial hole that Dalton McGuinty’s Liberals have dug. We must address this gap to protect Ontario’s long-term financial stability."


No surprise here -- they intend to reduce the wages and working conditions of public sector workers.  The fact that public sector wage settlements have fallen behind inflation is of no account.  Real wages are not falling fast enough.


Workers who have had their right to strike removed  and who have to settle contract disputes through interest arbitration (e.g. police, firefighters, hospital workers) are singled out for special punishment, however:


"In recent years, arbitrators have awarded unions excessive contracts, even as Ontario has been saddled  with record deficits and a struggling economy. Ontario families get stuck with the bill. We will fix this costly problem. We will require arbitrators to respect the ability of taxpayers to pay, and take into account local circumstances. We will make the system more transparent and accountable by requiring arbitrators to explain the reasons for their decisions. When arbitrators make decisions that cost Ontario families money, those families deserve to know why. We will require that clear and tight time frames be met by arbitrators so that the provincial and local governments can budget accordingly."


Most of this is pretty vague as well.  (For example, arbitrators already consider "ability to pay" - So what might the Conservatives mean when they say "We will require arbitrators to respect the ability of taxpayers to pay"?)  But the intent to go after workers stuck with interest arbitration is unmistakable.


This will go down just fine among the tiny percentage of Ontarians who sit around corporate board rooms.  The problem for the Conservatives is the policy will primarily hurt people they would like to win over: police officers,  firefighters, paramedics, and nurses.  And that's a lot of people.

Comments

  1. The global recession was hard on economies around the world. Ontario worked with people when others would have cut them loose. The economy is back on track. Ontario jobs are coming back and growth is returning. See the progress report here: http://bit.ly/k2ADga

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hudak cannot be trusted.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…