Skip to main content

Are P3s a way for foreign corporations to downsize Canadian business?

Concern that public private partnerships (P3)  disadvantage Canadian business was deepened with the announcement  that a new massive P3 hospital project in Montreal will see foreign corporations play the dominant role.  Here is the comment from (the long-time privatization booster), the National Post:  

'We are talking about very limited Canadian ownership. There are four equity partners: Innisfree, based in the United Kingdom and one of the largest investors in hospitals around the world, has a 30% stake; Laing O'Rourke Canada Ltd., a U.K.-based construction entity, has a 25% stake; OHL Construction Canada Ltd., a Spanish construction, concessions and services groups that has been around for more than 90 years, has a 25% stake; and Dalkia, a large French company that provides facilities management services to more than 5,000 hospitals around the world, has a 20% stake.'

Duncan McCallum, managing director of infrastructure at RBC Capital Markets and lead manager on the private placement, said "We have a group of very large and very experienced European players," noting that some of the equity investors are new to Canada.

Canadian businesses are relatively smaller and have less P3 experience than competing foreign corporations, leaving them at a disadvantage for such projects, especially as P3s are often large and complex deals.   Foreign governments are likely promoting P3s as a way to strengthen the foreign reach of their corporations.  

It is also not clear that Canadian corporations have the strength and dynamism to push through major privatization initiatives.  Certainly foreign corporations are often the winners of major privatizations: think of Carillion, Compass, Sodexho,and Aramark.  With this project we 'gain' some new major, foreign players, who will, no doubt, push more privatization.  

Total construction costs of the Montreal P3 hospital are supposed to be $1.99 billion, with $1.37 billion raised through 38.8 year  bonds with a 6.721% coupon.  That is a long, long term. And while I am no economist, that sounds to me like very high interest payments.

Indeed, even the Post adds, "The deal is the lowest rated P3 to come to market.  As is the norm, the P3 project is below the rating enjoyed by the host province." (Apparently, Quebec is rated "A high" while this project gets only BBB [high] by DBRS and Baaa2 by Moody's.)

 The project is not supposed to be completed until March 2020.

Update 2:20 pm: Also announced today is the P3 consortia that is suppose to build, design, finance, and maintain the new Halton hospital.  Included in the consortia is British P3 heavy-weight Carillion (which has won many Ontario P3 bids) and US transnational Honeywell.  


Popular posts from this blog

Public sector employment in Ontario is far below the rest of Canada

The suggestion that Ontario has a deficit because its public sector is too large does not bear scrutiny. Consider the following. 

Public sector employment has fallen in the last three quarters in Ontario.  Since 2011, public sector employment has been pretty flat, with employment up less than 4 tenths of one percent in the first half of 2015 compared with the first half of 2011.

This contrasts with public sector employment outside of Ontario which has gone up pretty consistently and is now 4.7% higher than it was in the first half of 2011.

Private sector employment has also gone up consistently over that period. In Ontario, it has increased 4.3% since the first half of 2011, while in Canada as a whole it has increased 4.9%.

As a result, public sector employment in Ontario is now shrinking as a percentage of the private sector workforce.  In contrast, in the rest of Canada, it is increasing. Moreover, public sector employment is muchhigher in the rest of Canada than in Ontario.  Indeed as…

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics.

The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs). 

With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed.  

But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea.  Following a recent second OCHU tour wi…

Hospital worker sick leave: too much or too little?

Ontario hospital workers are muchless absent due to illness or disability than hospital workers Canada-wide.  In 2014, Ontario hospital workers were absent 10.2 days due to illness or disability, 2.9 days less than the Canada wide average – i.e. 22% less.  In fact, Ontario hospital workers have had consistently fewer sick days for years.

This is also true if absences due to family or personal responsibilities are included.
Statistics Canada data for the last fifteen years for Canada and Ontario are reported in the chart below, showing Ontario hospital workers are consistently off work less.
Assuming, Ontario accounts for about 38% of the Canada-wide hospital workforce, these figures suggest that the days lost due to illness of injury in Canada excluding Ontario are about 13.6 days per year ([13.6 x 0.68] + [10.2 x 0.38] = 13.1).

In other words, hospital workers in the rest of Canada are absent from work due to illness or disability 1/3 more than Ontario hospital workers. 

In fact, Canad…