Skip to main content

Are P3s a way for foreign corporations to downsize Canadian business?

Concern that public private partnerships (P3)  disadvantage Canadian business was deepened with the announcement  that a new massive P3 hospital project in Montreal will see foreign corporations play the dominant role.  Here is the comment from (the long-time privatization booster), the National Post:  


'We are talking about very limited Canadian ownership. There are four equity partners: Innisfree, based in the United Kingdom and one of the largest investors in hospitals around the world, has a 30% stake; Laing O'Rourke Canada Ltd., a U.K.-based construction entity, has a 25% stake; OHL Construction Canada Ltd., a Spanish construction, concessions and services groups that has been around for more than 90 years, has a 25% stake; and Dalkia, a large French company that provides facilities management services to more than 5,000 hospitals around the world, has a 20% stake.'


Duncan McCallum, managing director of infrastructure at RBC Capital Markets and lead manager on the private placement, said "We have a group of very large and very experienced European players," noting that some of the equity investors are new to Canada.

Canadian businesses are relatively smaller and have less P3 experience than competing foreign corporations, leaving them at a disadvantage for such projects, especially as P3s are often large and complex deals.   Foreign governments are likely promoting P3s as a way to strengthen the foreign reach of their corporations.  

It is also not clear that Canadian corporations have the strength and dynamism to push through major privatization initiatives.  Certainly foreign corporations are often the winners of major privatizations: think of Carillion, Compass, Sodexho,and Aramark.  With this project we 'gain' some new major, foreign players, who will, no doubt, push more privatization.  

Total construction costs of the Montreal P3 hospital are supposed to be $1.99 billion, with $1.37 billion raised through 38.8 year  bonds with a 6.721% coupon.  That is a long, long term. And while I am no economist, that sounds to me like very high interest payments.

Indeed, even the Post adds, "The deal is the lowest rated P3 to come to market.  As is the norm, the P3 project is below the rating enjoyed by the host province." (Apparently, Quebec is rated "A high" while this project gets only BBB [high] by DBRS and Baaa2 by Moody's.)

 The project is not supposed to be completed until March 2020.


Update 2:20 pm: Also announced today is the P3 consortia that is suppose to build, design, finance, and maintain the new Halton hospital.  Included in the consortia is British P3 heavy-weight Carillion (which has won many Ontario P3 bids) and US transnational Honeywell.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2. 

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).    For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.   But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending.  Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th

The hospital crisis: No capacity, no plan, no end

While Canada has achieved universal public healthcare coverage, that does not mean conservative forces have given up trying to erode that coverage and expand corporate care where it does not currently exist. The battle has become particularly intense in Ontario under the Ford Progressive Conservative government, which is implementing serious cuts to the level of care and moving to bring in for-profit mini-hospitals. Inadequate Staffing.   Less and less of hospital spending is on staff.   Employee compensation as a share of hospital expenditures has consistently shrunk in Ontario. This is not some immutable law of hospital development.  It is in stark contrast with the rest of Canada, where compensation has become a larger share and now accounts for 67.1%. Hospitals in provinces other than Ontario now have 18 percent more staff per capita than hospitals in Ontario. Overall, if Ontario had the same staffing capacity as the other provinces and territories, there would be another 33,778 full t