Skip to main content

Are P3s a way for foreign corporations to downsize Canadian business?

Concern that public private partnerships (P3)  disadvantage Canadian business was deepened with the announcement  that a new massive P3 hospital project in Montreal will see foreign corporations play the dominant role.  Here is the comment from (the long-time privatization booster), the National Post:  

'We are talking about very limited Canadian ownership. There are four equity partners: Innisfree, based in the United Kingdom and one of the largest investors in hospitals around the world, has a 30% stake; Laing O'Rourke Canada Ltd., a U.K.-based construction entity, has a 25% stake; OHL Construction Canada Ltd., a Spanish construction, concessions and services groups that has been around for more than 90 years, has a 25% stake; and Dalkia, a large French company that provides facilities management services to more than 5,000 hospitals around the world, has a 20% stake.'

Duncan McCallum, managing director of infrastructure at RBC Capital Markets and lead manager on the private placement, said "We have a group of very large and very experienced European players," noting that some of the equity investors are new to Canada.

Canadian businesses are relatively smaller and have less P3 experience than competing foreign corporations, leaving them at a disadvantage for such projects, especially as P3s are often large and complex deals.   Foreign governments are likely promoting P3s as a way to strengthen the foreign reach of their corporations.  

It is also not clear that Canadian corporations have the strength and dynamism to push through major privatization initiatives.  Certainly foreign corporations are often the winners of major privatizations: think of Carillion, Compass, Sodexho,and Aramark.  With this project we 'gain' some new major, foreign players, who will, no doubt, push more privatization.  

Total construction costs of the Montreal P3 hospital are supposed to be $1.99 billion, with $1.37 billion raised through 38.8 year  bonds with a 6.721% coupon.  That is a long, long term. And while I am no economist, that sounds to me like very high interest payments.

Indeed, even the Post adds, "The deal is the lowest rated P3 to come to market.  As is the norm, the P3 project is below the rating enjoyed by the host province." (Apparently, Quebec is rated "A high" while this project gets only BBB [high] by DBRS and Baaa2 by Moody's.)

 The project is not supposed to be completed until March 2020.

Update 2:20 pm: Also announced today is the P3 consortia that is suppose to build, design, finance, and maintain the new Halton hospital.  Included in the consortia is British P3 heavy-weight Carillion (which has won many Ontario P3 bids) and US transnational Honeywell.  


Popular posts from this blog

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…