Skip to main content

Will new banking crisis drive up P3 costs?

Dexia, one of Europe's larger banks, is also one of the larger backers of public private partnerships. The Guardian reports it has been involved in about $9.36 billion worth of P3 projects in Britain. Dexia has also been involved in three P3s in British Columbia, two hospitals and a bridge.

As of today, the bank has fallen on hard times, connected to fears about its potential loses in Greece. So it is now on the verge of receiving a bail out from (who else?) the public.

This is the second time around for Dexia in just three years: the bank had to be bailed out by France and Belgium during the 2008 banking crisis with $6.92 billion of taxpayers' money.

( Apparently these guys truly do believe in PUBLIC private partnerships.)

Dexia may be just the first to go if there is a new round of bank crises. If so, more P3 financiers may need a public bailout before it is over.

“Dexia is by no means alone in terms of being at risk here,” said Simon Maughan, head of sales and distribution at MF Global Ltd. in London. “There are plenty of other banks out there that have grown their assets way in excess of their deposit base like Dexia. That makes them massively exposed."
Less than three months ago Dexia got a clean bill of health in European Union "stress tests".

The P3 model (which relies on private financing of infrastructure projects) is the model Ontario hopes to use to rebuild its hospitals.

OCHU/CUPE released a report following the 2008 banking crisis detailing how the financial problems were driving up the cost of the P3 financing. There was no response from the Ontario government.

The shares for European lenders are down 36% this year in light of the renewed debt crisis. No one is sure the banks can fund themselves, it seems. The latest banking problems introduce even more uncertainty about the banks. And that may drive up P3 financing costs further.

We'll see if the government responds this time.


Popular posts from this blog

Public sector employment in Ontario is far below the rest of Canada

The suggestion that Ontario has a deficit because its public sector is too large does not bear scrutiny. Consider the following. 

Public sector employment has fallen in the last three quarters in Ontario.  Since 2011, public sector employment has been pretty flat, with employment up less than 4 tenths of one percent in the first half of 2015 compared with the first half of 2011.

This contrasts with public sector employment outside of Ontario which has gone up pretty consistently and is now 4.7% higher than it was in the first half of 2011.

Private sector employment has also gone up consistently over that period. In Ontario, it has increased 4.3% since the first half of 2011, while in Canada as a whole it has increased 4.9%.

As a result, public sector employment in Ontario is now shrinking as a percentage of the private sector workforce.  In contrast, in the rest of Canada, it is increasing. Moreover, public sector employment is muchhigher in the rest of Canada than in Ontario.  Indeed as…

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics.

The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs). 

With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed.  

But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea.  Following a recent second OCHU tour wi…

Hospital worker sick leave: too much or too little?

Ontario hospital workers are muchless absent due to illness or disability than hospital workers Canada-wide.  In 2014, Ontario hospital workers were absent 10.2 days due to illness or disability, 2.9 days less than the Canada wide average – i.e. 22% less.  In fact, Ontario hospital workers have had consistently fewer sick days for years.

This is also true if absences due to family or personal responsibilities are included.
Statistics Canada data for the last fifteen years for Canada and Ontario are reported in the chart below, showing Ontario hospital workers are consistently off work less.
Assuming, Ontario accounts for about 38% of the Canada-wide hospital workforce, these figures suggest that the days lost due to illness of injury in Canada excluding Ontario are about 13.6 days per year ([13.6 x 0.68] + [10.2 x 0.38] = 13.1).

In other words, hospital workers in the rest of Canada are absent from work due to illness or disability 1/3 more than Ontario hospital workers. 

In fact, Canad…