Skip to main content

Will new banking crisis drive up P3 costs?

Dexia, one of Europe's larger banks, is also one of the larger backers of public private partnerships. The Guardian reports it has been involved in about $9.36 billion worth of P3 projects in Britain. Dexia has also been involved in three P3s in British Columbia, two hospitals and a bridge.

As of today, the bank has fallen on hard times, connected to fears about its potential loses in Greece. So it is now on the verge of receiving a bail out from (who else?) the public.

This is the second time around for Dexia in just three years: the bank had to be bailed out by France and Belgium during the 2008 banking crisis with $6.92 billion of taxpayers' money.

( Apparently these guys truly do believe in PUBLIC private partnerships.)

Dexia may be just the first to go if there is a new round of bank crises. If so, more P3 financiers may need a public bailout before it is over.

“Dexia is by no means alone in terms of being at risk here,” said Simon Maughan, head of sales and distribution at MF Global Ltd. in London. “There are plenty of other banks out there that have grown their assets way in excess of their deposit base like Dexia. That makes them massively exposed."
Less than three months ago Dexia got a clean bill of health in European Union "stress tests".

The P3 model (which relies on private financing of infrastructure projects) is the model Ontario hopes to use to rebuild its hospitals.

OCHU/CUPE released a report following the 2008 banking crisis detailing how the financial problems were driving up the cost of the P3 financing. There was no response from the Ontario government.

The shares for European lenders are down 36% this year in light of the renewed debt crisis. No one is sure the banks can fund themselves, it seems. The latest banking problems introduce even more uncertainty about the banks. And that may drive up P3 financing costs further.

We'll see if the government responds this time.


Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…