Skip to main content

The Mop and Pail instructs

Toronto's national newspaper, the Globe and Mail, yesterday called on Canadian governments to take inspiration from the pending (savage) cuts to the public sector in Britain. Budgets will be cut (outside of health care and ‘foreign aid’) by an average of 25%. A leaked British Treasury document estimated that 600,000 public sector jobs will be eliminated. The Mirror reported on July 4th that the cuts may be increased to 40%, with even more job loss (http://by.ly/3yrx).

From the 'no surprise here' category --  A new study from the British Fabian Society  (Don't Forget the Spending Cuts!) indicates that the bulk of the British cuts will fall on working people: the average annual cut in public spending on the poorest tenth of households is £1,344,equivalent to 20.5% of their household income.  That percentage of income remains quite high, until you get to the top. The annual cut in public spending on the richest tenth of households is £1,135, equivalent to just 1.6% of their household income.   The Guardian provides commentary on the study here.

Of course, these are just the latest in public sector cuts that are sweeping across many developed capitalist countries (and US states) in recent weeks.


While these sorts of cuts have not come to Ontario yet, I have to suspect that many in corporate Canada will see this emerging trend as a golden opportunity to further undermine public services (and, with that, the security of working people).

While some economists see the cuts to the public sector as slowing economic growth, this idea has not yet become a major issue in either Ontario or Canada.  Indeed, the public has been pushed (but not yet stampeded) in the opposite direction recently through the efforts of our own Prime Minister Harper at the G20.  This despite the uncertainty over the economic utility of the cuts that is found even among mainstream economists (see http://by.ly/u7zyei ).

As usual, business is planning ahead on this issue, not just the overall grab o' swag, but right down to the itty-bitty details. One major corporate consulting firm has even released a report alerting governments to the ‘threat’ of increased fraud in the public sector as the cuts proceed!

Will labour develop an effective counter to this growing threat?  Time will tell.  -- Doug

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).   

For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.  But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. 

Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period.

So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more than they have ann…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …