Skip to main content

Payback for doing the dirty work? Or popular success? LHIN gives Niagara hospital $49 million.

Kudos to Maria Babbage at the Canadian Press for today's story on hospital deficits. Nobody else is digging up the facts on hospital funding like she is.  Nevertheless, the bottom line is hardly surprising:


For the second year in a row, more than a third of Ontario hospitals are bleeding red ink, amounting to a $107-million shortfall. Sixty-one of the province's 159 public hospitals, or 38 per cent, reported a deficit in the last fiscal year that ended March 31...The financial picture of Ontario hospitals is largely unchanged from the previous year, when 61 hospitals reported shortfalls amounting to $154-million...There is concern that while the number of cash-strapped hospitals remained steady, it may be a different story in 2011 due to shrinking provincial funds.

But buried at the end of the story is a surprising fact: The Niagara Health System, which (in)famously played ball with the Ontario government by cutting services and Emergency Rooms, got a WHOPPING $49 million in provincial cash injections from the (Liberal government appointed) Local Health Integration Network (LHIN).

That's a heck of a lot of cash.

Especially when you recall that total global funding this year is only supposed to go up 1.5% or about $225 million for all 159 hospitals.


The Niagara communities were outraged by the Liberal government  cuts (and the antics of the NHS) and pushed back hard, probably harder than anywhere else in the province. 

Now, should I be pleased that the community got something for their hard work, or disgusted by what might be a payback to the hospital bosses for a doing the government's dirty work?  

As always, I'm open to  your opinion, dear readers. 

But I do note that this year, just like last year, most of the new funding to hospitals will go out through 'one time funding'  rather than global funding.  Total hospital funding is supposed to go up this year by 4.7% according to Babbage (4.9% by other accounts). That means that 'one time funding' will be more than twice the increase in global funding, which is set to increase only 1.5% this year. And most of that 'one time' funding has not yet been declared. 

The communities that push back the hardest will get more, it seems.

By moving to a system that makes most of the new money contingent, the Liberal government probably wants to make the hospitals more beholden and more obedient.  But they are also making the process more political. And that they may regret.  


 dallan@cupe.ca

P.S.  -- For the Globe's version of Babbage's story see this.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Huge cuts in public sector wages predicted

The Ontario Financial Accountability Office (FAO)   says  that, with inflation, real wages in the public sector will decline 11.3% over the three year period  2021/2 - 2023/4 .  This would radically deepen the trend towards lower wages during the last ten years.   The FAO reports that since 2011, the average annual salary for the Ontario public sector employees (defined here as employees of schools, colleges, provincial government, provincial agencies, and hospitals) has increased by $10,385   -- or 1.6 per cent on average annually.  This is the lowest increase of all the sectors and lower than inflation, which averaged 1.8 per cent per year. Over the ten years that would be about a 2% pay cut.   The FAO reports that wage settlements were the lowest in the provincial public sector over the last decade:   Hospital Wages Especially Challenged: The FAO predicts hospital wages will increase even less than in the public sector  -- just ...

Too many public sector workers in Ontario?

Opponents of public services often try to portray the public sector as having grown disproportionately.  In fact, since 1976, the number of public sector employees has not quite kept pace with the population. In 1976, the number of public sector employees in Ontario  as reported by Statistics Canada averaged 830,800.  By 2012, the number had increased to 1,330,700 -- a 60.2% increase.  That sounds like significant growth -- true. But the population has increased  from 8,413,779 in 1976 to 13,505,900 in 2012, a 60.5% increase.   In other words, population growth has run slightly ahead of the growth in public sector employment.     In 1976, close to 10% of the population worked in the public sector.  It stayed pretty much this way until the Mike Harris government came to power when it dipped below 9%.  It returned close to the historical range in the last six years or so, declining in 2012 to below the 1976 averag...

Are health care administrative expenses out of control in Ontario?

The Progressive Conservative government has justified its health restructuring plans with the claim that administrative expenses are much higher in Ontario than in Canada.  When introducing the reforms, health minister Christine Elliott  claimed , “Over the last five years, Ontario has spent 30% more than the Canadian average in administrative expenses on its health care system.”   Elliott did not indicate her source of information. Presumably, however, the Progressive Conservatives are referring to the CIHI simplified and user friendly “ Your Health System ” graphs. Those graphs show “administrative expenses” in Ontario at 5.8% in Ontario while it is 4.5% in Canada.   This CIHI measure is actually fairly narrowly defined. It is the percentage of “the legal entity’s” total expenses associated with the administrative, finance, human resources and communications functional centres. However “the legal entity” used for this estimate is [1] only...