Skip to main content

Same story, different town. The usual hospital cuts, this time in Grimsby, Ontario

More good news, this time with bed cuts proposed for West Lincoln Memorial Hospital in Grimsby.

As usual, this is funding driven, after the hospital sucked up and paid down two years of deficits with its cash reserves  (racking up a $1 million deficit in 2008-9 and $1.5 million in 2009-10).  That money was supposed to go for better facilities.    But No.

Also as usual, 'ALC' patients get the blame. And also ALSO as usual, it’s not clear where these patients will go.

It remains unclear, to this writer at least, how many beds will go.  Fourteen staff positions will be ‘affected’. 

The hospital says it will develop its plans in the coming weeks. That's something to look forward to. For more see this. – D.

dallan@cupe.ca

Comments

  1. A comment from Pat Schofield of hte People's Health Coalition:

    Isn't this comical....they no longer refer to them as bed cuts or closures.....now they are reduction of beds occupied by patients. And they try to make you think, it is not necessarily permanent....if they are needed for complex or acute care again, they can put them in service again. Don't believe them.

    Go to the HNHB LHIN web site and read their Complex Care Integrated Report and you will see what
    the future plans are:
    1. Change Complex Continuing Care to Complex Care (no more continuing)
    2. New definition of Complex Care to be "time limited"
    3. After determined length of time...now 45 to 85 days....(but can easily be changed in the future to 30 to 60 days), give the patient a choice to go to a LTC home or nursing home, go home or pay a daily rate every day for your care at whatever rate the hospital decides...or die.
    4. They don't want old people clogging up hospital beds
    5. They insist they are not "reducing" acute beds....but complex beds. However in our hospitals in Port Colborne and Fort Erie these "acute" beds have just recently been designated as Complex Continuing Care.

    The HNHB LHIN chair Juanita Gledhill says people should not live in hospitals, but they also shouldn't die because there are not enough acute or active beds to accommodate people in need. This is happening in Niagara.

    Example: Patient goes to Port Colborne hospital and is transferred to Welland for blood transfusion. Patient needs to be resuscitated at Welland. It is decided patient needs cardiac resources available in St. Catharines. No beds available. Patient waits for 4 days at Welland. Eventually patient is transferred to Kitcher. By then patient has acquired pneumonia. Many complications follow. Patient is eventually transferred back to Welland. Patient dies.

    Question: There are several questions, but if the patient had received help on the first day instead of waiting 4 days before being transferred to Kitchener...would the patient have survived?

    This example of shortage of beds shows you the impact on lives and patient care. We have a lot more examples in Niagara.

    Pat Scholfield
    People's Healthcare Coalition

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…