Skip to main content

Wage freeze has little impact on the deficit. But will McGuinty have to reassess the politics of attacking public sector workers?

Holding the line on those salaries .... is a linchpin of the government's plan to eliminate Ontario's $21.3-billion deficit.  (Windsor Star -- See here.  My emphasis. )

This seems to be the notion behind the government's compensation freeze proposal.

I use "notion" advisedly here:  this doesn't really qualify as a full fledged 'idea'. Here's why.

Some have suggested the wage freeze might 'save' $750 million next year.

But that is a gross exaggeration.  The government (and government backed employers) have already signed contracts with the major public sector bargaining groups for this year, next year, and, often, beyond that. So any savings aren't going to happen for these groups any time soon. 

And, of course, decreasing the real wages of a large chunk of workers will have a negative impact on the economy and local jobs. The incomes of working people support local economies - more so than corporate profits (that are getting a major cash injection thanks to the McGuinty government's corporate tax cuts).

But even if there were $750 million in savings next year and the policy didn't harm Ontario's economy, would this policy make a real difference to the deficit? Well $750 million is 3.5% of the $21.3 billion deficit in the most recent fiscal year. 

So 96.5% of the deficit is left.

Some "linchpin".

As noted elsewhere, economic growth has had a much more significant impact reducing the deficit this year, and if we can believe, Finance Minister Dwight Duncan, it will have more of an impact in the near future. 

But if the compensation freeze is not really about economics, what is it about?

For my money, it is politics and scapegoating.  Someone has to take the blame -- and it doesn't matter if they had no hand in creating the problem if it helps the government get re-elected in the fall of 2011.

Well, the government may just have to re-assess that political calculation.  On this, only time will tell.

But, in the interim, we have work to do.


dallan@cupe.ca

Comments

  1. I agree. The current economic climate makes it convenient to suggest the necessity of a compensation freeze. We have to look below the surface of the deficit spin. 8 years of austerity policy is a harsh burden for public workers to shoulder. I hope we can learn from others about how to/to not organize to fight the assault:

    http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/396.php#continue

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).   

For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.  But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. 

Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period.

So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more than they have ann…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …