Skip to main content

Wage freeze has little impact on the deficit. But will McGuinty have to reassess the politics of attacking public sector workers?

Holding the line on those salaries .... is a linchpin of the government's plan to eliminate Ontario's $21.3-billion deficit.  (Windsor Star -- See here.  My emphasis. )

This seems to be the notion behind the government's compensation freeze proposal.

I use "notion" advisedly here:  this doesn't really qualify as a full fledged 'idea'. Here's why.

Some have suggested the wage freeze might 'save' $750 million next year.

But that is a gross exaggeration.  The government (and government backed employers) have already signed contracts with the major public sector bargaining groups for this year, next year, and, often, beyond that. So any savings aren't going to happen for these groups any time soon. 

And, of course, decreasing the real wages of a large chunk of workers will have a negative impact on the economy and local jobs. The incomes of working people support local economies - more so than corporate profits (that are getting a major cash injection thanks to the McGuinty government's corporate tax cuts).

But even if there were $750 million in savings next year and the policy didn't harm Ontario's economy, would this policy make a real difference to the deficit? Well $750 million is 3.5% of the $21.3 billion deficit in the most recent fiscal year. 

So 96.5% of the deficit is left.

Some "linchpin".

As noted elsewhere, economic growth has had a much more significant impact reducing the deficit this year, and if we can believe, Finance Minister Dwight Duncan, it will have more of an impact in the near future. 

But if the compensation freeze is not really about economics, what is it about?

For my money, it is politics and scapegoating.  Someone has to take the blame -- and it doesn't matter if they had no hand in creating the problem if it helps the government get re-elected in the fall of 2011.

Well, the government may just have to re-assess that political calculation.  On this, only time will tell.

But, in the interim, we have work to do.


dallan@cupe.ca
Labels:

Comments

  1. joanneJuly 26, 2010 at 8:30 PM

    I agree. The current economic climate makes it convenient to suggest the necessity of a compensation freeze. We have to look below the surface of the deficit spin. 8 years of austerity policy is a harsh burden for public workers to shoulder. I hope we can learn from others about how to/to not organize to fight the assault:

    http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/396.php#continue

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2. 
Post a Comment
Read more

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).    For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.   But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending.  Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th
Post a Comment
Read more

The hospital crisis: No capacity, no plan, no end

While Canada has achieved universal public healthcare coverage, that does not mean conservative forces have given up trying to erode that coverage and expand corporate care where it does not currently exist. The battle has become particularly intense in Ontario under the Ford Progressive Conservative government, which is implementing serious cuts to the level of care and moving to bring in for-profit mini-hospitals. Inadequate Staffing.   Less and less of hospital spending is on staff.   Employee compensation as a share of hospital expenditures has consistently shrunk in Ontario. This is not some immutable law of hospital development.  It is in stark contrast with the rest of Canada, where compensation has become a larger share and now accounts for 67.1%. Hospitals in provinces other than Ontario now have 18 percent more staff per capita than hospitals in Ontario. Overall, if Ontario had the same staffing capacity as the other provinces and territories, there would be another 33,778 full t
Post a Comment
Read more