Skip to main content

Deb Matthews determined (to do some damage to small Ontario hospitals)

Deb Matthews is staunchly defending the decision to close the emergency rooms in Fort Erie and Port Colborne despite the sharp critique of the LHINs (illegal) consultation process by Andre Marin, the Ontario Ombudsman. 

Matthews told Niagara area papers "We're not revisiting that decision. The decision remains the right decision...we're absolutely not going to be reopening that decision."  Obligingly, the LHIN chairwoman Juanita Gledhill said her board doesn't plan to revisit its earlier decisions either.  Big surprise.


This does not bode well for other smaller hospitals.  Even in the face of months of community outrage, calls from the opposition parties, and an Ombudsman's report suggesting a phony consultation process, Matthews will not even consider a review of the decision to close the small hospital ERs.

Now there's a government official determined to do some damage.

So it is interesting to hear that  Port Colborne Mayor Vance Badawey says "I would consider a judicial review (of LHIN decisions). The process is flawed and it should be stopped." Marin, the Ombudman, also raised this possibility. 

Pat Scholfield of the People's Healthcare Coalition of Port Colborne stated "We consider the HIP (Hospital Improvement Plan) was foisted on us without proper process.  Now is the time for the government to do an investigation into the NHS." For her part, Sue Salzer of the Fort Erie Yellow Shirt Brigade is happy to list some of her "favourite" words Marin used in his report" "Hanky panky, sneaky, illegal, cherry-picked ."

Of  course, Matthews is promising to improve the LHIN consultation process. (As indeed she might. Her boss Dalton McGuinty said the LHINs need firmer government guidance: "we've got to make sure that we provide appropriate guidelines". See the Toronto Star article on this story.)

I doubt this will amount to much.  Franker comments  may be from the (outgoing) Champlain LHIN CEO, Dr. Robert Cushman:

Cushman said sometimes things need to be done privately before public consumption. Being asked to prepare for a number of budget scenarios by the Ministry of Health, for example, could mean anything from the status quo to reductions of staff and services if there is a 0% increase in funds. Going to the public before it's known which one the ministry will approve can cause unnecessary anger and outcry. "When you make tough decisions to close down two emergency rooms, there are going to be some unhappy people and they're going to be vocal."

When the Liberals started the LHINs, they promised better consultations. And indeed the boss of the South West LHIN, Mike Barrett still defends the LHIN consultations, even after Marin's report: 

Barrett said he's disappointed Marin and others have failed to recognize the progress made by the LHINs in handling decisions in the open that used to be made by bureaucrats behind closed doors in Toronto. "Now, all of our decisions are made in an open and transparent fashion. This is the way decisions should be made," said Barrett.

 So, I'm betting Cushman's comments will prove a better guide than Matthews'. 

Of the LHINs, Natalie Mehra of the Ontario Health Coalition added: "It will be an election issue.  I think that it is the hot-button issue in many, many communities, including Liberal ridings where local hospitals are facing major service cuts."
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).    For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.   But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending.  Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations...
Post a Comment
Read more

The hospital crisis: No capacity, no plan, no end

While Canada has achieved universal public healthcare coverage, that does not mean conservative forces have given up trying to erode that coverage and expand corporate care where it does not currently exist. The battle has become particularly intense in Ontario under the Ford Progressive Conservative government, which is implementing serious cuts to the level of care and moving to bring in for-profit mini-hospitals. Inadequate Staffing.   Less and less of hospital spending is on staff.   Employee compensation as a share of hospital expenditures has consistently shrunk in Ontario. This is not some immutable law of hospital development.  It is in stark contrast with the rest of Canada, where compensation has become a larger share and now accounts for 67.1%. Hospitals in provinces other than Ontario now have 18 percent more staff per capita than hospitals in Ontario. Overall, if Ontario had the same staffing capacity as the other provinces and territories, there would be another...
Post a Comment
Read more