Skip to main content

CCACs discover that coordination is the better way. But Ontario Liberal government policy of compulsory contracting out undermines coordination

The Toronto Star today makes a major big deal about changes in Ontario's home care system that are being developed by the Central West Community Care Access Centre (CCAC).

Apparently, the CCAC is trying to improve coordination by making sure that "everybody in the circle of care is in the communications loop and knows what they are doing so that you look at the person as a whole being," according to Margaret Mottershead, CEO of the Ontario Association of Community Care Access Centres.

In the past such care has been uncoordinated because it has involved multiple community health-care agencies and multiple health professionals, says Dr Brian Golden who is working with the Central West CCAC on this reform.


One agency sends a nurse to a patient’s home, another dispatches a personal support worker and another an occupational therapist. ...To this end, a single agency will be responsible for all aspects of a patient's care - not only healing the wound, but addressing the causes. In the case of a patient with diabetes, a dietitian could be sent to the home as well as a nurse who specializes in wound care and a chiropodist who specializes in foot care. "We have to start seeing the full person - from the foot ulcer, to the diabetic, to the full person," Golden said

Big bucks can be saved, they suggest. 

But, if lack of coordination and multiple provider agencies is such a problem (as surely it is), why not get rid of our current home care system which requires Community Care Access Centres to contract out services.  Surely direct provision by a single public, not for-profit agency would allow the strongest coordination. 
 
But no -- this Liberal government is committed to home care competitive bidding and compulsory contracting out.  Rivalry, multiple provider agencies, and lack of coordination are inherent to the system.  So true coordination is going to have to wait this government out.


Send me a comment! dallan@cupe.ca

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…