Skip to main content

Hospital centralization wears thin in Quinte. The perils of putting all your eggs in one basket

A pretty good editorial from the Belleville Intelligencer on one peril of hospital centralization.

QHC needs to rethink putting eggs in one basket

It's emergency surgery only at QHC hospitals this week and it's all because of a breakdown in sterilization equipment -- at one hospital site.That should prompt some questions about how the corporation centralizes its services. Scheduled surgeries and procedures at hospitals in Belleville, Trenton and Picton have been cancelled until Sept. 20 due to broken sterilization equipment....

Years ago, when QHC was established, it was the work of corporate planners that things like dietary needs, equipment distribution, supplies and even sterilization were centralized in the interest of cost-effectiveness.But, when something goes wrong in the central site where a certain crucial service is based, as we see with sterilization and surgery cuts this week, it illustrates the flaw in the scheme.  With the current onset across Canada of increased rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin- resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in busy hospitals, it is worrisome that closure of one sterilization unit can affect so many sites, locally.

While this will blight hospital surgeries in Quinte for a while, it is actually part of a broader problem.   It's not just in Quinte that hospital support services are being centralized -- it's right across the province.  And it's not just support services that are being centralized -- it clinical services too.  Just ask Hamilton...
Moreover, the issue flagged by the Intelligencer is just one sort of problem with hospital centralization -- there's a lot more reasons to be concerned: access to health care services in local communities, the vibrancy and viability of smaller communities, the loss of local jobs, and, yes, even costs.
The centralization (and closure) of hospital services directed by the Health Services Restructuring Commission (HSRC) in the 1990s did not lead to reduced spending on hospitals and health care – indeed, there was a significant increase in spending. And many HSRC directed hospital-restructuring projects left a shambles for health care workers to clean up.

A second instance of the centralization of services in the 1990s was the centralization of jail services. Two large, centralized jails were built along with a new centralized facility to cook and chill jail meals. The result did not impress the provincial auditor general. Existing institutions actually produced food more cheaply. And the new cook-chill facility was only able to supply six institutions instead of the promised ten. Despite a decline in the average inmate count, operating costs for institutional services increased by 19% over four years.

As cost savings are often the real reason for the centralization of hospitals services, Ontario's recent experiences with public sector centralization should not be dismissed out of hand.


Popular posts from this blog

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…