Skip to main content

On diverting patients from hospitals. Is that deja vu I'm feeling?

With the elimination of hospital emergency rooms (ERs) and the reduction in hospital beds, ambulance "offload delays" (where overflowing hospitals and ERs make it impossible for paramedics to transfer their patients to hospital staff) are once again growing.

This is reminiscent of the ER problems about a decade ago after the cuts to hospital services occasioned by the Harris government.  At that time,  ambulances were turned away from backlogged hospitals, infamously resulting in the death of a young asthma sufferer, Joshua Fluelling.

Fluelling, 18, was having a severe asthma attack in January 2000 when his ambulance was redirected from the closest hospital, Scarborough Grace Hospital, and sent to Markham-Stouffville Hospital, more than twice the distance away. Scarborough Grace was on critical care bypass and not accepting new patients the night of Fluelling's attack. On route to Markham, the teenager suffered respiratory failure and brain damage. He died later in hospital.

In a lawsuit, his family alleged that by instituting cuts to hospital beds and emergency wards, the provincial government had failed to provide adequate care.  A coroner's jury called for more paramedics to be hired and for hospital bed closures be stopped.

Notably, the government changed the protocol that allowed hospitals to turn ambulances with critically ill patients away.

This time around, the new plan is to divert ambulances from hospital ERs.  In Niagara,where offload delays are, reportedly,  four hours,  they are expanding the number of patients that are diverted to Urgent Care Centres.   They are, in fact, developing a protocol called  "Project Omega" to divert patients from ERs. 

The last time I heard that name, it was from a novel about a murky, and evil, big business plot.


Popular posts from this blog

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…