Skip to main content

Auditor General: Hospital contracting out practices fall short. Now what about the big contracts?

The Auditor General makes two general observations about the contracting out of services to consultants: [1] Ontario’s health-care sector makes extensive use of consultants, and [2] all too often, they do this without following sound business practices.

The Auditor found some problems with the practices of the Ministry of Health (e.g. the Ministry seemed to favour certain consultants in some cases) and more in the practices of the LHINs.


But it's the hospitals that really get the brunt of the Auditor's criticisms. "We noted far too many instances at the hospitals we visited where sound public-sector business practices were not followed in the selection and oversight of consulting ser­vices." So hospitals did not require:


• assignments to be well defined and properly justified before consultants were engaged;

• adequate contractual arrangements with fixed price ceilings;

• payments to be tied to specified deliverables; and


• consultant performance to be properly managed.

And indeed the AG exposes some very embarrassing incidents.  A consultant was paid $170,000 and then demanded another $3,000 for detailed receipts. Another consultant (billing $1,100 for every 8 hours of work) got paid while he vacationed in Japan.   In fact the consultant billed for every single working day for three years -- no days off. 


It makes you wonder if the hospital bosses ever read the news stories that came out of the eHealth contracting out scandal.

The Auditor recommends that "hospitals should track and regularly report to Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) on their use of consultants in a manner that demonstrates their compliance with required policies and sound public-sector business practices."

It is certainly a good thing that the Auditor has exposed these problems.

But the focus, so far, is only on management services contracted out to consultants. And that sort of contracting is, in many cases, only a rather small portion of the contracting done by hospitals.

Much bigger contracts go for work formerly done by unionised employees of the hospitals -- e.g. for dietary services, housekeeping services, office services, and maintenance.

That's where the big boys, the transnational corporations, get in on contracting out hospital services.  And that is where some bigger money is found.  Indeed, when the Auditor reviewed the Brampton privatized P3 hospital, he found major problems with the contracting-out of such services. That's where some of the biggest extra costs were found for the P3.  These contracts involve many millions of dollars, not tens or hundreds of thousands.

So good on the Auditor.  But how about some public reports on the major contracting out that goes on in hospitals? It would be great to see hospitals publicly report on their contracts with transnational corporations for dietary, housekeeping, or other major hospital services (and not just for the little things, like consulting services).


If they goofed up so badly with consultant contracts, there's probably some big money to be saved if the service contracts are reviewed.

Oh -- and by the way -- the ink wasn't dry on the Auditor's report before I began seeing claims from hospitals that they had learned their lesson and would do better. 

We will see.


dallan@cupe.ca

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…