Skip to main content

Superbug comes to a crowded Ontario hospital

The Sault Area Hospital has yet another outbreak of hospital acquired infections (HAIs), the Sault Star reports . In fact the MRSA outbreak was declared September 7, and 22 patients have now tested positive.

Hospital president Ron Gagnon pointed to overcrowding as a contributing factor. "It's showing over-capacity is an issue," he added.

As per government policy, the hospital is trying to reduce bed occupancy by developing new programs to move patients back to home.  And the hospital has achieved some modest success.  As of last week, 99 "ALC patients" (typically patients in medical or surgical beds who no longer require a medical or surgical bed), down from an average 103 in September.

However, the majority of these patients  -- 73 -- are awaiting placement in long-term care and cannot benefit from these programs.

As elsewhere, long-term care spaces are scarce in the community.

And as elsewhere, the problem of high bed occupancy and the high number of ALC patients has been an ongoing problem for some time.

In 2007, SAH president Gagnon noted: "We average 40 patients in acute care beds who no longer require acute care. We've had upwards of 60 on some days." About one-third of SAH's acute care beds housed non-acute patients at the time.

The superbug problem is not new either.  After a deadly C. difficile outbreak of 2006-07, SAH implemented 29 recommendations to control infections, including enhanced housekeeping. SAH also dealt with a superbug outbreak last November.

Gagnon said that with the latest outbreak they've also stepped up housekeeping in affected areas to twice daily and introduced "terminal" cleans after discharges from certain parts of the hospital.

Gagnon could not say how much the enhanced measures would cost, but said the budget has room for contingency costs and "we will be obviously dipping into that."

The costs associated with past outbreaks were significant, helping to push the SAH into deficit in 2007.

In March 2007, when the hospital faced a deficit of $8 to $9 million, the hospital had spent about $5 million on extra expenses for the C. Difficile outbreak that began the previous spring. 

At the time, hospital CEO Gagnon also blamed the deficit on the inability of the SAH to move ALC patients to the community due to a persistent shortage of resources in the community.

The more things change, the more things stay the same....


Popular posts from this blog

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…