Skip to main content

Retirement homes: What will it mean if more hosptial patients end up in them?

A Toronto Star story last month provides some useful information on for-profit retirement homes. These homes now take care of patients that, until recent years, were taken care of in hospitals. With hospital cutbacks, more hospital patients will be forced into them.  Here is part of what the Star reported:

• The Ontario coroner's office is investigating the suspicious deaths of three elderly residents of a controversial west Toronto retirement home.

• The coroner's probe comes after a Star investigation detailed allegations that residents Edith Farrell, 80, and Danny Henderson, 74, died in hospital earlier this year after suffering severe malnutrition at In Touch Retirement Living.  After the story ran, the family of a third resident, 83-year-old Nellie Dineno, came forward with allegations that she, too, had serious health problems that went untreated before her death in late July.

• Critics say the government will allow the privately operated retirement homes to accept residents with high-medical needs without creating tough regulations. Judith Wahl, executive director for the Advocacy Centre for the Elderly, says the new act will focus more on consumer protection than medical care.

• Wahl applauded the coroner's investigation, saying it will expose the risks facing medically fragile residents of retirement homes. The coroner's probe comes after Toronto police and Ontario's Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee announced separately a few weeks ago they were investigating allegations of missing resident money.

• Among the problems were dangerous food preparation, underpaid staff, a rent cheque (belonging to Dineno) cashed after her death and court records detailing a confrontation that led to an assault allegation, which a judge later dismissed.

• Many of the residents had dementia or other serious medical problems and required the care of a government-funded and licensed nursing home. There are 77,000 nursing home beds in Ontario, with a waiting list of 24,000. Retirement homes in Ontario are unregulated, while nursing homes face hundreds of regulations, although many problems persist in these homes as well.

• The Liberal government says its new Retirement Homes Act will create oversight but critics say little will change unless regulations - as yet unwritten - force rigorous, surprise inspections and tough sanctions against problem homes.

• The government should require the coroner's office to investigate every tenth retirement home death like it does in nursing homes, Wahl said. "It is important that there be public oversight if they are going to offer heavy levels of care."

For the whole story click here
 
dallan@cupe.ca

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).   

For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.  But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. 

Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period.

So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more than they have ann…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …