Skip to main content

P3s: "Little more than money-making mechanisms for builders and banks"

Banks and construction companies are ratcheting up vast profits from public private partnerships (P3s) according to a new British study that looked at equity sales for P3s.
A study of p3 projects from 1998 through 2010 by Dexter Whitfield for the European Services Strategy Unit reveals that there are huge profits to be made from the sale of equity once a P3 project is operational. 
The study found more than 240 P3 equity sales involving more than 1,000 P3 projects.  The sales generated £10 billion.  This amounted to an average profit of around 50%.  That's not too shabby when compared to an average operating profit for construction companies of 1.5%.
Whitfield said that, based on the findings, P3 projects were "little more than money-making ventures."
"The level of profiteering from PPP equity transactions makes a nonsense of the original value for money assessments," he said. "If these profits had been taken into account at the evaluation stage then few projects would have been approved. PPP projects are little more than money-making mechanisms for builders and banks," he said.
The two highest profiting sectors were health and criminal justice, with averages of 67% and 55% respectively, with transport and education falling below the 50% average for P3s, the report said.
The study concluded that  the British Treasury and National Audit Office failed to identify the true scale and profitability of P3 equity transactions
Ontario continues to follow Britain by developing privatized P3 hospitals (which the Ontario government now calls 'alternative financing and procurement').
The study is available here.   A report from the Guardian on the study is here.

dallan@cupe.ca

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…