Tim Hudak and the demise of the LHINs: Real change or rhetoric?

For some time, Ontario Progressive Conservative leader Tim Hudak has called for the demise of Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs).

In some ways, this echoes the call from labour unions and community health care advocates.

Here's what Mr. Hudak said about LHINs in Coburg the other day: "This is basically a bloated layer of middle management that gets between the Ministry of Health and the doctors and nurses and the patients they are trying to care for....People at the LHINs, they have never spent a minute with patients... friends that's wrong and that is why as premier, I will close doors on the LHINs and put every penny into care for Ontario families."

While Mr. Hudak's emphasis on the bloated layer of bureaucracy squares with a right wing take on public services, it has very little to do with reality.

The amount of money spent on the LHINs is puny compared to the real costs of health care. And, in any case, those dollars cannot actually be turned over to health care - some body will have to coordinate health care services, even if it is not the LHINs.

So, a lot of Mr. Hudak's comments on the LHINs sound more like partisan rhetoric.

For my money, there are two basic problems with the LHINs. First, they are (quietly) charged with centralizing and reducing local hospital services and, second, they distance elected government officials from decisions to reduce or centralize local health care services.

In other words, they allow governments to to evade responsibility for one of the most basic political issues (access to health care), an issue that should be fully subject to the democratic political process.

And in this way the LHINs are like the Health Services Restructuring Commission (HSRC) established by the LAST Progressive Conservative government. THAT government used the HSRC to take the flack for unpopular decisions to cut and centralize hospital services.

So might a new Progressive Conservative government create a more open and democratic process for health care coordination? Will they stop the cuts to local health care services?

Well, unfortunately, there's very little sign of that. Quite the contrary...

dallan@cupe.ca

Comments

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data. This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization. Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion. That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year. The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million. In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations...

The hospital crisis: No capacity, no plan, no end

While Canada has achieved universal public healthcare coverage, that does not mean conservative forces have given up trying to erode that coverage and expand corporate care where it does not currently exist. The battle has become particularly intense in Ontario under the Ford Progressive Conservative government, which is implementing serious cuts to the level of care and moving to bring in for-profit mini-hospitals. Inadequate Staﬃng. Less and less of hospital spending is on staff. Employee compensation as a share of hospital expenditures has consistently shrunk in Ontario. This is not some immutable law of hospital development. It is in stark contrast with the rest of Canada, where compensation has become a larger share and now accounts for 67.1%. Hospitals in provinces other than Ontario now have 18 percent more staﬀ per capita than hospitals in Ontario. Overall, if Ontario had the same staﬃng capacity as the other provinces and territories, there would be another...

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics. The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs). With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed. But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea. Following a recent second...

Defend Public Healthcare

Search This Blog