Many "ALC" patients need hospital care.

A new report indicates that 18% of acute care beds were occupied by patients awaiting an alternate level of care (“ALC patients”).

ALC patients are waiting for a different level of care than what they are currently receiving in the hospital (e.g. a patient waiting for a complex continuing care bed who is in an acute care bed). While about half of these patients are awaiting long term care, the ALC designation does not necessarily mean that they should not be in hospital.

About 47% of the 2,812 ALC patients in acute care beds are waiting for a long term care bed. Most of the rest of the ALC patients in acute care beds are awaiting other sorts of hospital beds: rehabilitation (385 patients), complex continuing care (229 patients), convalescent care (118 patients), and palliative care (153 patients).

Surprisingly, only a relatively small number are awaiting home care (149 patients), assisted living or supportive housing (83 patients), or simply to go home (64 patients).

Another 1,807 ALC patients are in non-acute hospital beds (rehab beds, complex continuing care beds, mental health beds, etc.), bringing the total number of ALC patients in hospital to 4,679.

This represents 16% of hospital beds (acute and non-acute beds). This percent has been relatively constant since at least late 2007. The rate varies from 31% in the Northeast LHIN and 26% in the Northwest LHIN to 9% in the Mississauga Halton LHIN. Reportedly, a little over half (58%) of these patients are awaiting placement in long term care facilities.

Despite, the very high bed occupancy levels, hospital beds for ALC (or convalescing) patients are under direct threat of closure, even while there are no long term care, rehabilitation, convalescent, palliative, or complex continuing care hospital beds to take care of such patients.

Too often, this means forcing patients into inappropriate nursing homes too far from home and family, back to home without proper support (generally burdening unpaid women family members), and into for –profit retirement homes with insufficient services.

dallan@cupe.ca

Comments

Huge cuts in public sector wages predicted

The Ontario Financial Accountability Office (FAO) says that, with inflation, real wages in the public sector will decline 11.3% over the three year period 2021/2 - 2023/4 . This would radically deepen the trend towards lower wages during the last ten years. The FAO reports that since 2011, the average annual salary for the Ontario public sector employees (defined here as employees of schools, colleges, provincial government, provincial agencies, and hospitals) has increased by $10,385 -- or 1.6 per cent on average annually. This is the lowest increase of all the sectors and lower than inflation, which averaged 1.8 per cent per year. Over the ten years that would be about a 2% pay cut. The FAO reports that wage settlements were the lowest in the provincial public sector over the last decade: Hospital Wages Especially Challenged: The FAO predicts hospital wages will increase even less than in the public sector -- just ...

Too many public sector workers in Ontario?

Opponents of public services often try to portray the public sector as having grown disproportionately. In fact, since 1976, the number of public sector employees has not quite kept pace with the population. In 1976, the number of public sector employees in Ontario as reported by Statistics Canada averaged 830,800. By 2012, the number had increased to 1,330,700 -- a 60.2% increase. That sounds like significant growth -- true. But the population has increased from 8,413,779 in 1976 to 13,505,900 in 2012, a 60.5% increase. In other words, population growth has run slightly ahead of the growth in public sector employment. In 1976, close to 10% of the population worked in the public sector. It stayed pretty much this way until the Mike Harris government came to power when it dipped below 9%. It returned close to the historical range in the last six years or so, declining in 2012 to below the 1976 averag...

Are health care administrative expenses out of control in Ontario?

The Progressive Conservative government has justified its health restructuring plans with the claim that administrative expenses are much higher in Ontario than in Canada. When introducing the reforms, health minister Christine Elliott claimed , “Over the last five years, Ontario has spent 30% more than the Canadian average in administrative expenses on its health care system.” Elliott did not indicate her source of information. Presumably, however, the Progressive Conservatives are referring to the CIHI simplified and user friendly “ Your Health System ” graphs. Those graphs show “administrative expenses” in Ontario at 5.8% in Ontario while it is 4.5% in Canada. This CIHI measure is actually fairly narrowly defined. It is the percentage of “the legal entity’s” total expenses associated with the administrative, finance, human resources and communications functional centres. However “the legal entity” used for this estimate is [1] only...

Defend Public Healthcare

Search This Blog