Skip to main content

Are Liberals and Conservatives planning to undermine interest arbitration?

Mop and Pail columnist Adam Radwanski makes the following claims about public sector interest arbitrators in today's paper:


"The opposition is publicly calling them out. The Ontario government is grumbling about them behind closed doors. Both hold them responsible for hundreds of millions of dollars in wage costs that could put the squeeze on public services, as the province struggles to climb out of deficit....
"The situation appears to be coming to a head, with growing rumblings that the party holding power after October’s election will seek to overhaul the arbitration process. But how exactly the Liberals or Conservatives would achieve that is unclear.
"The Tories seem to be a little further along in their thinking; a party official said they’re developing a 'mechanism' that would involve new legislation. But it has to be a little daunting that former premier Mike Harris - who had a stronger stomach for confrontation than today’s leaders - went down this road in the 1990s and emerged with little to show for it."
Hospital workers are without the right to strike in Ontario and are compelled by law to settle contract disputes through interest arbitration, a process whereby the hospitals and the union puts their case to an independent arbitrator (and a union and hospital nominee).  
OCHU was forced to go through a four year campaign in the 1990s to get the Mike Harris PC government to move off its plan to develop an  arbitration process biased in favour of the employers. 
It has only because the parties have access to an impartial process, that the Hospitals and OCHU have been able to freely negotiate four central agreements since that time.  
The McGuinty Liberals have long courted public (and private) sector unions -- with some success.  So if the Liberals are seriously considering this, it would be a troubling change in direction.   It will be interesting to see if those unions are able to secure a commitment from the Liberals that they will not introduce changes to the interest arbitration system after the election.  
There is no word in Radwanski's piece on what legal mechanism the Conservatives are looking at.  Radwanski, however, does muse about two models:  “final-offer arbitration, in which arbitrators choose one of the two sides’ proposals rather than coming down the middle," and "a form of peer review in which other arbitrators would sign off on their colleagues’ decisions, giving individuals less control over precedent-setting contracts."
Interest arbitration awards for hospital RNs and paramedical staff are likely to come out before the provincial election.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…