Skip to main content

First Canadian acquired case of NDM-1 superbug -- in an Ontario hospital

In 2010, a study published in the famous academic journal The Lancet Infectious Diseases flagged the emergence of NDM-1, an enzyme that confers high levels of resistance of gut bacteria to almost all antibiotics, leading to potentially life-threatening pneumonia and urinary tract infections  The study concluded,  "The potential of NDM-1 to be a worldwide public health problem is great, and co-ordinated international surveillance is needed."
At that time, NDM-1 was widespread in India.  
But Canada now has it's first domestically acquired case of NDM-1 -- in an Ontario hospital, according to a new study in the Canadian Medical Association Journal.  
A man admitted to a Toronto hospital with a stroke later tested positive for NDM-1. He hadn't travelled outside of southwestern Ontario for the past 10 years; none of his family members or friends had travelled to India.  Fortunately, the man remained asymptomatic and did not spread the organism to other patients at the hospital.  There is reportedly no cause for public concern.
NDM-1 can exist inside different bacteria, like E.coli, and it makes them resistant to one of the most powerful groups of antibiotics - carbapenems.  These are generally reserved for use in emergencies and to combat hard-to-treat infections caused by other multi-resistant bacteria.  At least one of the NDM-1 infections the Lancet researchers analysed was resistant to all known antibiotics.

Health officials should consider making NDM-1 reportable, says Dr. Susan Poutanen, a medical microbiologist and infectious disease physician at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto and author of the study.  "We don't have a handle on the exact numbers because it's not currently tracked," she said.

The Public Health Agency of Canada recommends that patients identified as being infected with or colonized by NDM-1 should be treated in single rooms using contact precautions and enhanced environmental cleaning for the duration of their stay in hospital, as well as other steps.   Dr. Poutanen reports that European guidelines recommend more precautionary steps

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…