Skip to main content

Freedom of information in the hospital sector -- Is the government backing out?

Late last year, following contracting-out scandals at E-health, the LHINs, and the hospitals, the provincial government brought in the Bill 122, the Broader Public Sector Accountability Act.  The Act requires LHINs and hospitals to report annually on their use of consultants and also makes hospitals subject to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act  as of January 1, 2012.  Once in place, records from the previous five years would be subject to freedom of information requests, the government assured us. 

But that was then.  

Apparently, the insurance industry and the Ontario Hospital Association were displeased with this turn of events.   

Recently, an amendment was introduced to the Budget bill (YES, of all things, the Budget bill). Under Schedule 15 of Bill 173, information and records provided to or prepared by a hospital committee regarding assessment of quality of care would be exempted from public access to information.  The terms of the exemption were broad and ill-defined.

Patient advocates and the Ontario Health Coalition (OHC) sprung into action and pressed for change.  

Even with the very short notice provided by the government, more than a dozen groups appeared at the legislative hearings concerning the Bill to ask the members of the legislature not to pass Schedule 15.

Subsequently, government members introduced an amendment, but little or no progress was evident. Here's how the OHC responded:

“The government’s amendment allows hospital executives to make some documents secret, by simply stamping “confidential” on them or retroactively suggesting that the records were intended to be private,” said Cybele Sack of ImPatient for Change, a patient advocacy group.  “Our freedom of information laws are meant to increase transparency and this amendment undermines that spirit.”....

“The government’s proposal to extend hospital secrecy significantly undermines the government’s own Public Sector Accountability Act,” (OHC Director, Natalie Mehra) added. “It puts the onus on patients and the public to undertake lengthy and complex appeals processes to justify seeking information from hospitals. It is entirely the wrong way around. Hospitals should have to show cause to keep information secret. They are publicly-funded institutions upon which every Ontarian relies for care. They should be more publicly accountable, not less.”


We need better access to hospital information.  As trade unionists we have experienced considerable difficulty getting legitimate information from the hospitals.   

The government told us its Broader Public Sector Accountability Act would provide better access.  Now,  they have to make good on that promise and develop a better process. 

The Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs will vote on amendments this Thursday morning  May 5 at 9 am, after which Bill 173 will go to the Ontario Legislature for final passage.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…