Skip to main content

Now where is the other $71.8 M in new hospital funding going?

Ministry of Health and media reports place the total hospital funding increase announced Friday to reduce Emergency Room (ER) wait times at $100 million for 74 hospitals.  

Above and beyond the $28.2 million for short stay beds discussed earlier, that leaves $71.8 million for other ER projects. 

The Ministry says that another $47.4 million will be distributed among the 74 hospitals to fund other projects to decrease ER wait timesThis would include new hospital initiatives and initiatives already underway.  Which means that at least some of this new money will not result in any new capacity at the hospitals.   

The Ministry cites these as examples of activities that could be funded: 
  • Expanding  and reorganizing ER staff;  
  • Creating ER rapid assessment zones; 
  • Renovating ERs to improve patient flow. 
The Ministry also notes $10.3 million to reduce the time ER patients spend waiting for an initial assessment, and $14 million in "variable incentive funding" to reward qualifying hospitals for treating more patients within established targets. 

So there were also funding announcements for other hospitals on Friday "to reduce ER wait times": Royal Vic (in Barrie), $1.3 million, Quinte Health, $1.2 million; Peterborough Regional, $1.1 million; Grand River, $935 K; St. Mary's, $765 K, Cambridge Memorial, $782 K; and Brantford General, $250K.  

But it is not clear (to this writer) that any of these funding announcements will result in extra beds.  At Peterborough Regional the funding reportedly will go to making improvements in triage, shifting physician scheduling to match peak volumes and increasing the amount of doctors on regular schedules.  

In any case, the $100 M is  a fair scoop of cash: about 0.5% total funding increase for hospitals.   

And if there really is $100 million coming to improve ER service, the list of hospitals that will get some of it will have to grow by quite a bit. 


Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…