Skip to main content

OECD calls for improved pay and status for long term care workers

The influential Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has released a new report (Help Wanted? Providing and paying for long-term care ) that concludes that   aging populations in developed countries will cause spending on long term care to double or triple by 2050.  Spending on long-term care currently accounts for 1.5% of the economy in developed countries.


The growth in demand for long term care leads the OECD to conclude that pay and working conditions in long term care (including home care) must improve:

"Major reforms to attract more care workers and retain them in the sector should be put in place quickly. Most long-term care careers are dead-end jobs with a high turnover and low pay and benefits....Upgrading the status of the long-term care workforce by improving pay and working conditions is key."

These conclusions are particularly striking as the OECD is tightly tied to ruling elites, and is generally known for being boss-friendly rather than worker-friendly. 

Less surprisingly, the OECD raises the idea of privatization: "Countries have to spread the burden of such high costs, either by targeting universal benefits to those most in need of care or via public-private partnerships.  Private insurance could play a role in some countries... but is likely to remain a niche market unless made compulsory."

As well, the OECD is concerned about the impact of rising LTC costs on government, and is particularly keen to limit "institutional" long term care (i.e. nursing homes or homes for the aged):

Governments will need to find a balance between offering access to good-quality care and making their systems financially sustainable.... Around 70% of long-term care users receive services at home, but spending in institutional care accounts for 62% of total spending. Respite care, encouraging part-time work and paying benefits to family carers can all be cost-effective policies, reducing demand for expensive institutional care.

This line of thinking has already come to Ontario:  LHIN and government officials claim that up to 30% of people now in LTC facilities should be at home, and have slowed the growth of long term care facilities (even as wait lists for LTC beds explode).  

The OECD report also includes some information regarding Canada: 

  • In 2010, about 13%  of Canada’s population is aged over 65 (OECD average 15%), and about 3.5%  over 80 (OECD average 4%).
  •  In 2006, Canada’s expenditure on long term nursing care was equivalent to about  1.5% of its gross domestic product (about the OECD average).  More than 80% of these expenditures were  targeted to institutional care -- and that is significantly higher than the OECD average of 62%. 
  •  In 2008-09, about 0.7 % (250,000 individuals) of the Canadian population resided in an institution, of which about 75 % were 65 years and older. The 238,000 individuals are equivalent to about 4% of the population over 65.
  •  In 2008-09, there were approximately 4,850 residential care facilities across Canada with 270 000 approved beds.  Of these beds, about 217 000 were approved for homes for the aged.  
  • In 2006, more than 2.5 % (875,000 individuals) of the population reported receiving home health care and home support; about 60% of this group received home health care only.
  • In 2006, about 160,000 nurses and personal carers worked in the long-term care (LTC) sector on a full-time basis and close to 70,000 on a part-time basis.
  • Canada has a young and small LTC private insurance market.  In 2007, about 276 000 individuals (roughly 1% of the total population) subscribed to a long-term care insurance (75% as part of a group insurance plan).  A total of about $65 million (Canadian) was paid in premiums while about $9 million  in benefits were paid.








Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations...
Post a Comment
Read more

The hospital crisis: No capacity, no plan, no end

While Canada has achieved universal public healthcare coverage, that does not mean conservative forces have given up trying to erode that coverage and expand corporate care where it does not currently exist. The battle has become particularly intense in Ontario under the Ford Progressive Conservative government, which is implementing serious cuts to the level of care and moving to bring in for-profit mini-hospitals. Inadequate Staffing.   Less and less of hospital spending is on staff.   Employee compensation as a share of hospital expenditures has consistently shrunk in Ontario. This is not some immutable law of hospital development.  It is in stark contrast with the rest of Canada, where compensation has become a larger share and now accounts for 67.1%. Hospitals in provinces other than Ontario now have 18 percent more staff per capita than hospitals in Ontario. Overall, if Ontario had the same staffing capacity as the other provinces and territories, there would be another...
Post a Comment
Read more

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics. The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs).  With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed.   But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea.  Following a recent second...
Post a Comment
Read more