Skip to main content

One step forward in Niagara

The Ontario Health Coalition reported today that the Minister of Health and Long Term Care has finally relented and agreed to a review of the (so-called) "Hospital Improvement Plan" in Niagara.  As reported earlier, the Niagara municipal leaders had asked the Minister for a review in April.

The review will only focus on the parts of the HIP that have been implemented -- not those still pending.   The review will involve the Local Health Integration Network, the Niagara Health System hospital, and regional municipal leaders. They will establish terms of reference for the review.  Local municipalities have shown good leadership on the HIP, so many in Niagara will be looking to them to stand strong.  No doubt, community members will work hard to ensure that this is a serious attempt to review the HIP and not a whitewash.

The people in local communities (with the OHC) have fought the closures and cutbacks that came with the HIP tooth and nail.  So this step forward is their achievement.


  1. Niagara is gratified that the systemic problems resulting from the Hospital Improvement Plan will finally get the review requested. It"s been two long years for grassroots organizations, Politicians and even a few daring members of the medical community proclaiming differently.

    It is unfortunate that the Minister did not address a recent request of Niagara Mayors to place a moratorium on further implimentation of the HIP until after the review completion which will no doubt be timed for after the Provincial election.

    The NHS has been included in the review process which is very questionable...The wolf asked to count the chickens in the hen house has never proved to be a wise decision.

    Sue Salzer

  2. Sorry Minister Matthews, but this will not be adequate. We appreciate the review of the HIP, but it must also include strategies yet to be implemented.
    The biggest problem with the HIP is it will move almost all acute and emergency hospital services to the new hospital in St. Catharines.

    Seven surgical specialties will be moved out of Welland hospital under the HIP. These changes will dismantle Welland hospital to the point they will no longer be able to retain a viable 24/7 ER. If you don't believe me, read the Physician's Report prepared by the Welland physicians.

    Once Welland loses it's 24/7 ER patients in the southern tier will have to travel to St. Catharines for most care. In Port Colborne and Wainfleet that trip can take from 45 minutes to over an hour. This will not provide timely or safe intervention access.

    The review must look at the whole HIP.....not just part.

    Pat Scholfield


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…