Skip to main content

University dumps corporate food -- and gets fresh, instead

The food was so bad, the president of the University of Winnipeg, Lloyd Axworthy, says that “we were at the very bottom. We were being hung in effigy by students...Even the poutine was bad.”


So, two years ago, he decided to buy out the contract of its large, multinational catering firm. In its place, the school established its own arm’s-length culinary company, Diversity Foods, in partnership with the local non-profit SEED Winnipeg.  


The Globe and Mail reports that it was mandated to serve organic, locally grown food of an ethnically diverse variety, and to employ inner-city residents as their primary labour force.


The University now has a service that provides much better food. At the same time it has increased revenue for the University.  In fact the food is so popular that the university’s executive chef is Winnipeg’s most in-demand caterer.  


What's more the school’s buying power has persuaded suppliers to finally provide sustainable, organic products to the city, once deemed too small a market. 


Notably, the transnational corporation Compass had been involved in the university's food system.  Kingston General Hospital recently agreed to contract out its food to Compass, with a plan to ship in sealed food containers from hundreds of miles away, arguing that it could not build a local food network (and so could not lead the change to fresh, local, and nutritious food).  The Winnipeg achievement (and the achievements at St. Joe's hospital in Guelph) suggest otherwise.  


 The University's new executive chef, Ben Kramer, was first hired as a consultant, to investigate whether a university cafeteria could provide fresh and sustainable meals for a reasonable price.  After being hired on full-time, he claims to have only made one real change.  “We brought in real food. That was it,” he said


Kramer dismisses claims that healthy food is too big a challenge for cash-strapped schools.  “If you’re strictly concerned with profits and you don’t care about anything else, then yeah, it’s more expensive,” he said. “But we approach this with the mindset of being sustainable and paying our staff well. Why not try and raise the industry standard?”



“We made a million dollars more this year than we did with the charter company,” Mr. Axworthy said. “The students have come back.”


For the Globe and Mail story on this, click here.  



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…