Skip to main content

Media response to hospital settlement. A return to balance?

There has been relatively little in the media on the Hospital - ONA interest arbitration award (see here for more on the award).     But here is the gist of the media reports so far, first from Sun media:

McGuinty was also asked why Ontario nurses will get 0.9% lump sum bonuses the first two years of a new contract after the premier promised to freeze public sector salaries to give a needed break to taxpayers.  He responded that the wage freeze only applied to non-unionized workers employed directly by the Ontario government and not unionized nurses who work for public hospitals.  "We also made it clear that taxpayers will not be paying any more money. If you negotiate something beyond zero, you are going to have to find that within your existing budget." That would mean the deal with nurses will leave the tab with hospitals.

The Toronto Star ran an article with a similar bent, but also noted these remarks:

Premier Dalton McGuinty on Friday admitted it would be impossible for his government to freeze all public-sector salaries. "You can't freeze everybody's salary for two years.... We have made it clear that taxpayers will not be paying any more money ... to be fair, it is not adding pressure to our budget....We said (to public-sector employers), if you exceed or go beyond the zero, then you have to find that money inside your budget." Health Minister Deb Matthews also said the province doesn't have much say when it comes to arbitration awards or direct deals with union nurses.  "It was an arbitrated award and certainly far, far better than what we had experienced before," she said.  Ontario Hospital Association president Tom Closson said the increase is consistent with the government's wage freeze policy.  "And 2.75 (per cent) over three years is something we think is quite reasonable in context of the political environment," he said.

The Globe and Mail and the Canadian Press ran similar stories.  So far, I haven't seen any comment from the Progressive Conservatives. 

Recently, there has been sharp criticism of public sector bargaining from the media.  Is the relatively muted response to this award a sign that this trend has lost momentum?  I'm not optimistic.   


Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…