Media response to hospital settlement. A return to balance?

There has been relatively little in the media on the Hospital - ONA interest arbitration award (see here for more on the award). But here is the gist of the media reports so far, first from Sun media:

McGuinty was also asked why Ontario nurses will get 0.9% lump sum bonuses the first two years of a new contract after the premier promised to freeze public sector salaries to give a needed break to taxpayers. He responded that the wage freeze only applied to non-unionized workers employed directly by the Ontario government and not unionized nurses who work for public hospitals. "We also made it clear that taxpayers will not be paying any more money. If you negotiate something beyond zero, you are going to have to find that within your existing budget." That would mean the deal with nurses will leave the tab with hospitals.

The Toronto Star ran an article with a similar bent, but also noted these remarks:

Premier Dalton McGuinty on Friday admitted it would be impossible for his government to freeze all public-sector salaries. "You can't freeze everybody's salary for two years.... We have made it clear that taxpayers will not be paying any more money ... to be fair, it is not adding pressure to our budget....We said (to public-sector employers), if you exceed or go beyond the zero, then you have to find that money inside your budget." Health Minister Deb Matthews also said the province doesn't have much say when it comes to arbitration awards or direct deals with union nurses. "It was an arbitrated award and certainly far, far better than what we had experienced before," she said. Ontario Hospital Association president Tom Closson said the increase is consistent with the government's wage freeze policy. "And 2.75 (per cent) over three years is something we think is quite reasonable in context of the political environment," he said.

The Globe and Mail and the Canadian Press ran similar stories. So far, I haven't seen any comment from the Progressive Conservatives.

Recently, there has been sharp criticism of public sector bargaining from the media. Is the relatively muted response to this award a sign that this trend has lost momentum? I'm not optimistic.

Comments

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data. This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization. Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion. That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year. The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million. In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2.

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding: There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities). For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year. But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th

The hospital crisis: No capacity, no plan, no end

While Canada has achieved universal public healthcare coverage, that does not mean conservative forces have given up trying to erode that coverage and expand corporate care where it does not currently exist. The battle has become particularly intense in Ontario under the Ford Progressive Conservative government, which is implementing serious cuts to the level of care and moving to bring in for-profit mini-hospitals. Inadequate Staﬃng. Less and less of hospital spending is on staff. Employee compensation as a share of hospital expenditures has consistently shrunk in Ontario. This is not some immutable law of hospital development. It is in stark contrast with the rest of Canada, where compensation has become a larger share and now accounts for 67.1%. Hospitals in provinces other than Ontario now have 18 percent more staﬀ per capita than hospitals in Ontario. Overall, if Ontario had the same staﬃng capacity as the other provinces and territories, there would be another 33,778 full t

Defend Public Healthcare

Search This Blog