Skip to main content

Sudbury: Some recognition that health care rationing requires a range of solutions

Today, the provincial government announced $6.3 million to care for 'alternative level of care'  (ALC) patients at the Memorial site of the Sudbury Regional Hospital, at least for one more year.  The government characterizes this investment in 60 hospital beds as a way "to make it easier for patients to transition from hospital back home."   The hospital says the "surge capacity beds" will offer post-acute patients "the assistive care services they require before returning home safely." 


The government sees the beds as one part of a larger set of strategies and indeed increasing community and  hospital capacities is required to reduce the health care rationing reflected in hospital overloads, wait lists, cancelled surgeries, and ALC patients.


Sharon Richer, OCHU Area 6 vice-president calls this initiative ‘one small step forward.’
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousJune 24, 2011 at 4:02 PM

    I bet, if you check it out, you will find in the past a large number of hospital beds have been cut (maybe more than 60). That has created problems and bad publicity. Now they want to temporarily restore those beds, likely until after the election. Note they call them surge beds. When the election is over and the pressure is off, I bet they will once again close the surge beds. It's all about meeting the quota and the budget the government has set for them.

    Pat

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Huge cuts in public sector wages predicted

The Ontario Financial Accountability Office (FAO)   says  that, with inflation, real wages in the public sector will decline 11.3% over the three year period  2021/2 - 2023/4 .  This would radically deepen the trend towards lower wages during the last ten years.   The FAO reports that since 2011, the average annual salary for the Ontario public sector employees (defined here as employees of schools, colleges, provincial government, provincial agencies, and hospitals) has increased by $10,385   -- or 1.6 per cent on average annually.  This is the lowest increase of all the sectors and lower than inflation, which averaged 1.8 per cent per year. Over the ten years that would be about a 2% pay cut.   The FAO reports that wage settlements were the lowest in the provincial public sector over the last decade:   Hospital Wages Especially Challenged: The FAO predicts hospital wages will increase even less than in the public sector  -- just ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Are health care administrative expenses out of control in Ontario?

The Progressive Conservative government has justified its health restructuring plans with the claim that administrative expenses are much higher in Ontario than in Canada.  When introducing the reforms, health minister Christine Elliott  claimed , “Over the last five years, Ontario has spent 30% more than the Canadian average in administrative expenses on its health care system.”   Elliott did not indicate her source of information. Presumably, however, the Progressive Conservatives are referring to the CIHI simplified and user friendly “ Your Health System ” graphs. Those graphs show “administrative expenses” in Ontario at 5.8% in Ontario while it is 4.5% in Canada.   This CIHI measure is actually fairly narrowly defined. It is the percentage of “the legal entity’s” total expenses associated with the administrative, finance, human resources and communications functional centres. However “the legal entity” used for this estimate is [1] only...
Post a Comment
Read more

Too many public sector workers in Ontario?

Opponents of public services often try to portray the public sector as having grown disproportionately.  In fact, since 1976, the number of public sector employees has not quite kept pace with the population. In 1976, the number of public sector employees in Ontario  as reported by Statistics Canada averaged 830,800.  By 2012, the number had increased to 1,330,700 -- a 60.2% increase.  That sounds like significant growth -- true. But the population has increased  from 8,413,779 in 1976 to 13,505,900 in 2012, a 60.5% increase.   In other words, population growth has run slightly ahead of the growth in public sector employment.     In 1976, close to 10% of the population worked in the public sector.  It stayed pretty much this way until the Mike Harris government came to power when it dipped below 9%.  It returned close to the historical range in the last six years or so, declining in 2012 to below the 1976 averag...
16 comments
Read more