Skip to main content

Biggest nursing home operator closes - yet another P3 privatization disaster

Southern Cross, the giant British nursing home operator, is shutting down after months of financial troubles.  Until now, this giant for-profit corporation ran 752 nursing homes with 31,000 elderly and vulnerable residents. 

A spokesman for British Prime Minister David Cameron said no one would be left homeless, adding that local authorities have a duty to make sure people received the appropriate care.  According to the Southern Cross plan, 250 homes will be transferred to landlords. The landlords of the remaining 500 homes are still "finalising their plans" however.

Southern Cross had profited by buying a huge number of nursing homes and then realizing a cash bonanza by selling them to property companies and renting them back. But when government squeezed funding, Southern Cross continued to face steep rents and failed.
Southern Cross workers interviewed by the business newspaper the Financial Times spoke of a deterioration in standards over the past year, as the company’s finances lurched into crisis. One dietary workers reports that the food budget in her home had been reduced to 2.47 pounds per day per resident ($3.81 CDN). Earlier, this summer Southern Cross announced that it would lay off  3,000 nursing home workers.  

Southern Cross growth was part and parcel of a massive privatization of nursing home health care services in Britain.   About 100,000 beds in municipal homes have been replaced by beds run by for-profit corporations (and, to a lesser degree, by voluntary organisations). Barely 10% of all care remains in public hands.

Other Troubles?
The conservative newspaper, The Telegraphreports that "many private care home operators are under financial pressure."  It adds, however, that  "many care operators have complex structures and are in some cases owned by overseas companies." 

In other words, it will not be easy for families to determine whether the corporation they place their family member with is financially viable.

The Financial Times reports that "Care home operators face much tougher regulatory controls in the wake of Southern Cross’s collapse as the government attempts to protect residents and taxpayers."

Ontario plans to entrust the development of much of its public health care infrastructure to for-profit corporations via "public - private partnerships" (P3s).  


Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…