Skip to main content

Canada has a very high rate of health care acquired infections: WHO report

A new World Health Organization (WHO) study (Report on the Burden of Endemic Health Care Associated Infection Worldwide: Clean Care is Safer Care)  indicates that Canada has a high rate of Health Care Acquired Infections (HCAIs) compared to other developed countries.  


The study reports that Canada’s HAI incidence is 11.6%. Of the world’s economically advanced economies, only New Zealand reported a higher rate at 12%. (Notably, New Zealand also has very few hospital beds per capita.)  While Canada has a rate of 11.6% the HCAI prevalence in high income countries is 7.6%:

 

“According to published national or multicentre studies, pooled HCAI prevalence in mixed patient populations was 7.6% in high-income countries ...The estimated HCAI incidence rate in the USA was 4.5% in 2002, corresponding to 9 3 infections per 1000 patient-days and 1 7 million affected patients”

 

The Canadian rate is more than 50% higher than the rate reported for high income countries.  


While HCAI rates in developing countries are often higher than in Canada, some such countries have reported rates lower than Canada: Indonesia, Cuba, Latvia, Lithuania, Iran, Thailand, Lebanon, and Mongolia. 


The study underlines the large impact of HCAIs:

 

“In Europe, HCAIs cause 16 million extra-days of hospital stay, 37 000 attributable deaths, and contribute to an additional 110,000 every year  Annual financial losses are estimated at approximately € 7 billion, including direct costs only.  In the USA, approximately 99 000 deaths were attributed to HCAI in 2002 and the annual economic impact was estimated at approximately US$ 6.5 billion in 2004....

WHO reports that the incidence of HCAIs is especially associated with treatment in intensive care units: “In high-income countries, approximately 30% of ICU patients are affected by at least one episode of HCAI.”

The WHO study notes that HCAIs can be prevented:

“Robust evidence exists that HCAI can be prevented and the burden reduced by as much as 50% or more.  Solid recommendations have been issued by national and international organizations, but their application needs to be strengthened and accompanied by performance monitoring both in high-income and low- and middle income countries  HCAI must be treated as a priority patient safety issue within comprehensive approaches to be tackled effectively.”

The study suggests that HCAIs are the most common cause of death for residents in long term care facilities (as well as the most common reason for LTC residents to b e admitted to a hospital):

Several projects on infection control in long-term care facilities have been initiated in Europe over the last five years.  Accumulated evidence suggests that any resident living in these facilities develops one to three infections per year on average, most frequently urinary tract infection (UTI) and pneumonia  It was also demonstrated that the onset of infection represents the most common cause of hospital admission and death for residents in long-term care facilities, mainly from pneumonia.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…