Skip to main content

For-profit sectors drive up health care expenditures

Expenditures on hospitals saw some of the smallest increases in public sector health care expenditures over the last decade, according to a 2011 report from the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation (CHSRF).  

In contrast, health services from the sectors dominated by for-profit corporation (drugs and capital expenditures) saw the highest expenditure increases.  In fact the real per capita annual percentage increases for these two sectors were about double the increases for the hospital sector. 

Compound annual growth rates of real per capita public sector health care expenditures, 1999 to 2009, Canada
Use of funds                                                      Compound annual growth rate
Total health                                                                        4.13%
Hospital care                                                                      3.41%
Other institutions                                                                 2.45%
Physician care                                                                     4.30%
Other professionals                                                            -0.82%
Drugs                                                                                  6.32%
Capital                                                                                7.35%
Public health                                                                        5.77%
Administration                                                                     4.05%
Other health spending                                                          4.62%
Source: Research Synthesis on Cost Drivers in Health Sector and Proposed Policy Options, (chart 2.1), February 2011,CHSRF Series on Cost Drivers and Health System Efficiency  (2009 figures forecast)

In Ontario, the annual growth rate for hospitals was smaller still at 2.7% (the second lowest in Canada). 

What remains unclear is the health benefit the rapidly rising expenditures on drugs and capital provide.  Part of the increased costs for drugs and capital is for technological innovation (e.g. new drugs or new capital technologies like MRIs).  Here’s what the CHSRF report says on technological innovation:

In the context of rising public healthcare spending, an important question is whether increased expenditures generated by technological innovation are associated with positive net benefits. Some studies suggest that there are not many opportunities for productivity improvements, such as increased use of ambulatory surgery or reduced length of stays in hospital.  Therefore, measuring the costs and benefits of medical technologies is essential in evaluating technological change and assessing the productivity of medical care.

The report recommends "instituting a wider use of health technology assessment at all levels".
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Huge cuts in public sector wages predicted

The Ontario Financial Accountability Office (FAO)   says  that, with inflation, real wages in the public sector will decline 11.3% over the three year period  2021/2 - 2023/4 .  This would radically deepen the trend towards lower wages during the last ten years.   The FAO reports that since 2011, the average annual salary for the Ontario public sector employees (defined here as employees of schools, colleges, provincial government, provincial agencies, and hospitals) has increased by $10,385   -- or 1.6 per cent on average annually.  This is the lowest increase of all the sectors and lower than inflation, which averaged 1.8 per cent per year. Over the ten years that would be about a 2% pay cut.   The FAO reports that wage settlements were the lowest in the provincial public sector over the last decade:   Hospital Wages Especially Challenged: The FAO predicts hospital wages will increase even less than in the public sector  -- just ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Are health care administrative expenses out of control in Ontario?

The Progressive Conservative government has justified its health restructuring plans with the claim that administrative expenses are much higher in Ontario than in Canada.  When introducing the reforms, health minister Christine Elliott  claimed , “Over the last five years, Ontario has spent 30% more than the Canadian average in administrative expenses on its health care system.”   Elliott did not indicate her source of information. Presumably, however, the Progressive Conservatives are referring to the CIHI simplified and user friendly “ Your Health System ” graphs. Those graphs show “administrative expenses” in Ontario at 5.8% in Ontario while it is 4.5% in Canada.   This CIHI measure is actually fairly narrowly defined. It is the percentage of “the legal entity’s” total expenses associated with the administrative, finance, human resources and communications functional centres. However “the legal entity” used for this estimate is [1] only...
Post a Comment
Read more

Too many public sector workers in Ontario?

Opponents of public services often try to portray the public sector as having grown disproportionately.  In fact, since 1976, the number of public sector employees has not quite kept pace with the population. In 1976, the number of public sector employees in Ontario  as reported by Statistics Canada averaged 830,800.  By 2012, the number had increased to 1,330,700 -- a 60.2% increase.  That sounds like significant growth -- true. But the population has increased  from 8,413,779 in 1976 to 13,505,900 in 2012, a 60.5% increase.   In other words, population growth has run slightly ahead of the growth in public sector employment.     In 1976, close to 10% of the population worked in the public sector.  It stayed pretty much this way until the Mike Harris government came to power when it dipped below 9%.  It returned close to the historical range in the last six years or so, declining in 2012 to below the 1976 averag...
16 comments
Read more