Skip to main content

Niagara superbug report makes important recommendations

The new expert report from an Infection Control Resource Team (ICRT) on the C. Difficile outbreak at the Niagara Health System (NHS) makes a number of significant recommendations, including 11 concerning environmental cleaning at the NHS.  

The report notes that additional "housekeeping resources" have been brought in during the outbreak to increase the frequency of cleaning and that unit aides have been brought in to assist with environmental cleaning.  It adds: "These aides, in addition to increased and dedicated housekeeping staff, play a fundamental role in maintaining environmental cleanliness and both of these enhanced resources should be maintained over the long term." 

The report makes three recommendations on housekeeping staffing:

  • Increases in housekeeping resources put into place during the outbreak should be maintained permanently so that high risk units can maintain twice daily cleaning and dedicated housekeeping staff. 
  • Additional unit aides put into place on the medicine units during the outbreak should be retained permanently. 
  • One additional FTE housekeeper should be recruited for the night shift at the SCG site, so that the emergency department can retain a dedicated nighttime housekeeper and to ensure that there are sufficient resources to address environmental cleaning issues overnight.
The report notes: "C. difficile is a particularly difficult hospital-acquired infection to deal with as C. difficile spores readily contaminate the patient environment and are very difficult to remove and destroy. In managing a CDI outbreak, particularly one of the magnitude experienced by the NHS, it is imperative to use a sporicidal agent broadly as it can be assumed in a facility wide outbreak that gross spore contamination has occurred."

The report also notes the importance of a proactive approach:

"Given that environmental contamination is an important underlying cause of nosocomial transmission of antibiotic resistant organisms, and that environmental contamination can occur whenever there is an isolation burden on a given unit or in a facility, an important concept to keep in mind is that housekeeping and environmental cleaning should be proactive rather than reactive to maximize its benefit in preventing outbreaks."

The report recommends that "Outbreak measures such as enhanced cleaning can be implemented in advance of declaring a formal outbreak and when nosocomial activity is noted to be increasing. This should be considered as part of a proactive approach to outbreak avoidance."

The report recognizes that "housekeeping staff exhibited good cleaning techniques and applied excellent infection control practices."

The report also reflects on the infection control challenges created by a hospital operating over-capacity and overcrowded:

"As is the case for many Ontario hospitals, the NHS is frequently over census and therefore has issues of overcrowding and overstretched staff. In addition, most sites at the NHS have a chronically high isolation burden, due to high regional rates of antibiotic-resistant organisms. There are no hand hygiene sinks present in many clinical areas and certain facilities do not have patient bathrooms in every room. The ICRT acknowledges that these factors create a challenging patient care environment.

"The ICRT understands that at times the NHS would cohort suspect and confirmed CDI patients together. This practice should be discontinued immediately.... 

"Prior to declaration of the outbreak, it appears that transfer of both patients and patient care equipment between units was common. Increased movement of patients with actual or possible CDI increases the risk of spreading C. difficile and its spores, through environmental contamination and unwashed hands. During the outbreak, these transfers were minimized and this practice should be continued as part of outbreak management and prevention."

Infection Prevention and Control Staff
The report also makes important recommendations on increases in physician and managerial infection control and prevention staff. 

This report is a step forward in the battle against superbugs.  


Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…