Skip to main content

P3 fiasco: Windsor Star calls for resignation of Minister & review by AG

The Windsor Star has called for the resignation of the Health Minister over the Windsor long term care public-private partnership (P3) that recently fell apart.  The Star has also called for a review of the project by the Auditor General.

The Grace Hospital saga continued this week as a Ministry of Health spokeswoman admitted the province was "not aware" developer Lou Vozza was facing a mountain of civil judgments in 2009, just as the Liberals were expanding the scope of his contract to build a longterm care facility.


As the number of claims against Vozza became public - almost 30 parties were registered in Superior Court on June 24, the day the contract was finally cancelled - the sense of disbelief continued to grow.

How was it possible that Health Minister Deb Matthews, who just three weeks ago expressed faith in Vozza's ability to get the job done, would be oblivious to his financial woes from the get-go?

How could she be "very pleased" with his progress on June 11 when the government's own Ministry of Revenue had registered more than $63,000 in liens against the property just six weeks before? And how could anyone at Queen's Park not be up to speed after almost four years of delays and broken promises?....

The lack of due diligence at all levels is shocking; even more so since it goes back so many years. When the province upped Vozza's contract by 90 beds in February 2009, there were already court judgments of $1 million in unpaid bills against him. He hadn't paid city taxes in five years and had millions of dollars in mortgages.

It would have been simple to check on Vozza's financial status, had someone wanted to do so....

By not gathering the pertinent data, Matthews has done harm to the frail elderly patients who are supposed to be living on the Grace site today. She's failed Ontario taxpayers and jeopardized health care services in Windsor and Essex County.

Along with Matthews' resignation, the provincial auditor must fully investigate what went wrong. That review can't wait until after the election. It must start now.

Unfortunately, missing from the Star's editorial is any recognition that this is a P3 private fiance project or that the government (and likely the PCs who support more privatization) plan to increase the use of privatized P3s.


In his first review of a P3, the Auditor General exposed major problems with the Brampton Civic Hospital P3, echoing most of the concerns raised by the Ontario Health Coalition (and OCHU) earlier.  







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…