Skip to main content

There is no superbug panic -- but there are some reasonable demands

Commenting on a Niagara superbug rally Wednesday, the Ontario Hospital Association CEO complained that unions and politicians were being unhelpful, "basically turning  it into a panic situation".  

Hmm -- I don't get a sense of panic -- just a bona-fide concern in the community about the outbreak and the fact that the community wasn't informed about deaths of patients infected with C. Difficile at two sites until long after they occurred. I think the hospitals should accept that is a legitimate feeling in the community and encourage government to require standardized reports. 

Short of that, I think there is going to be more hard feelings in other communities.   Consider this:

  • Allison McGeer, director of infection control at Mount Sinai Hospital, says a new virulent strain of C. Difficile detected only in the past few years will kill 250 people in Ontario this year — about 10 times as many as a decade ago.
  • The Globe and Mail reports that there were C. Difficile outbreaks at one in fourteen hospitals  in May  -- that would be about 11 hospitals.  In some the outbreak may have ceased, the Globe reports, but other new outbreaks have started.  (Here's my count of where outbreaks are reported: Peterborough Regional, Guelph General, Osler, the Toronto East General,the Hotel Dieu Shaver, and, of course, Niagara Health System. The others remain unknown to me. Anyone else?)
Moreover, I think it might benefit the hospitals to work with the demands from local communities for better (or at least adequate) hospital services.

Especially now.

The hospitals face very troubling funding plans for the period after the election: according to the Auditor General even the Liberal plan (as opposed to the even more wretched PC plan) will mean they will have to get $1 billion in 'savings' in two years. (Something the AG rightly doubts they can do.)   

Rather than complain, it might be more useful to get on board and say what is surely the truth: with that sort of funding plan, the problems we are seeing now (with superbugs, with high bed occupancy, with inadequate resources for support services, with cancelled surgeries, with ambulance offload delay, with long term care wait lists, with insufficient rehabilitation and complex continuing care, etc.)  are going to get much worse.  


Popular posts from this blog

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).   

For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.  But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. 

Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period.

So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more than they have ann…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …